Washington stood down from Iran and pivoted to negotiating the Strait of Hormuz — oil surrendered the war bid, the long end rallied off a nineteen-year high, and September E-minis open with their cash equivalent already through the dealer ceiling.
One weekend decision repriced four asset classes. The strike on Iran was called off in favour of negotiating the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, and crude gave back overnight everything the blockade had been worth. What did not reverse is the reason the long bond spent last week at 2007 levels. The geopolitical risk premium is gone; the inflation risk premium is not; and equities are being asked to treat the first as if it settled the second.
| Instrument | Last | Chg | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 cash, Fri 31 Jul close | 7,489.72 | +0.70% | +9.41% YTD |
| E-mini S&P ES Sep · settle 7,519.25 | 7,563.00 | +0.58% | Through the call-wall translation |
| Nasdaq Comp / NQ Sep | 25,373.85 / 28,506 | +1.00% / +0.36% | Cash led Friday; futures lag |
| Dow / Russell cash close | 52,485.03 / 2,931.34 | +0.53% / −0.50% | Small caps red on an up day |
| YM / RTY Sep futures | 53,143 / 2,961.30 | +0.97% / +0.79% | Cyclicals lead the bid |
| VIX Fri close · Aug fut 17.90 | 15.97 | −0.13% | Contango; Sep 18.99 |
| 2Y / 10Y Treasury | 4.237% / 4.680% | −5.4 / −6.5bp | Fri 4.291% / 4.745% |
| 30Y Treasury Fri close 5.275% | 5.226% | −4.9bp | The number that matters |
| WTI / Brent | 79.80 / 83.60 | −5.8% / −4.9% | Hormuz premium surrendered |
| Gold / Silver | 4,105 / 58.05 | flat / flat | Unchanged — see §10 |
| Copper / Nat gas | 6.514 / 2.755 | +0.75% / +0.3% | Copper on China stimulus |
| DXY / USD-JPY EUR-USD 1.1522 | 99.83 / 156.92 | −0.08% / −0.41% | Worst dollar week since January |
| Bitcoin / Ether | 62,643 / 1,843 | −1.08% / −1.84% | Still not joining |
| AZN / BMY / BABA premarket | −4.4% / +4.6% / +3.8% | — | Pharma merger talks; Alibaba AI model |
| Gauge | Level | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| CNN Fear & Greed | 45 | NEUTRAL Prior close 42, week ago 37 — breadth Extreme Fear, credit Extreme Greed |
| AAII bulls / bears week to Jul 29 | 31.0 / 42.1 | −11.1 SPREAD Bulls under the 37.5% average four of five weeks |
| NAAIM managers Jul 22, last public print | 84.02 | WENT DARK Subscription-only since 1 August — §10 |
| Put/call total · SPX+SPXW | 0.91 / 1.10 | BALANCED Index hedging bid; equity-only 0.63 is complacent |
| VVIX / SKEW | 91.64 / 141.23 | TAILS BID Front vol cheap, crash protection dear |
| Fed path · Sept 16 | 63.4% hike | LIVE October 56.0%; December 43.9% |
| Dealer gamma regime | POSITIVE | DAMPEN Cash above the flip — levels in §04 |
The gauge that matters is the equity-only put/call at 0.63 against an index ratio of 1.10. Single-stock traders are not hedged; index traders still are — the professional book carries the protection, the retail book the beta. That is what made Friday's blow-ups so violent, with Roblox down 26.9% and Reddit down 21.0% on a session the index closed up 0.70%. Positioning is two-handed underneath: asset managers ran a net long near 944,800 E-mini contracts into 28 July while leveraged funds sat net short about 297,500.
| Day · ET | Event | Consensus | Prior |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 10:00 | ISM Manufacturing (Jul) | 54.0 | 53.3 |
| Mon 10:00 | ISM prices paid · employment | 70.0 / — | 73.0 / 49.7 |
| Mon 15:00 | Treasury financing estimates | — | — |
| Tue 10:00 | JOLTS job openings (Jun) | 7.25M | 7.594M |
| Wed 08:15 | ADP employment (Jul) | 75K | 98K |
| Wed 08:30 | Quarterly Refunding Announcement | — | — |
| Wed 10:00 | ISM Services (Jul) | 54.2 | 54.0 |
| Thu 08:30 | Initial claims · unit labour costs | 200K / 2.7% | 197K / 1.8% |
| Fri 08:30 | Nonfarm payrolls (Jul) | 83–91K | 57K |
| Fri 08:30 | Unemployment rate | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +29.53 | Role in today's tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall ceiling | 7,500.00 | 7,529.53 | 10.28 over Friday's close — futures are 33 points through it |
| Gamma flip | 7,435.64 | 7,465.17 | Dampen above, amplify below; cash is 54.08 above |
| Put wall floor | 7,400.00 | 7,429.53 | 1.20% below the close; the map fits in a hundred points |
Cannon's own September pivot for the E-mini sits at 7,496.33, first resistance 7,565.17, first support 7,451.67. Two methods converge on the same shelf from opposite directions: the pivot sits three points under the cash call wall, and R1 is within two points of where the contract trades now. When a pivot model and an options model agree that closely the level tends to behave — and this one is being tested before the bell.
The moving-average picture underneath is compressed. The S&P closed above every major average, but its 20-day at 7,481.15 and 50-day at 7,471.51 sit under ten points apart, stacked just above the gamma flip. Eli's weekend technical work reads the same shelf from the chart side: a short-term lower high but not a lower low, next supports 7,300 and the 7,237 June low. The Nasdaq is weaker on both methods — a lower low on the chart, cash 543.95 under its 20-day and 1,115.46 under its 50-day. And the Russell has closed back under its 50-day, the cleanest read on rotation versus bounce.
Calls the Fed “nakedly dovish, so financial conditions to continue to tighten until Fed forced to restore credibility via aggressive hikes,” and pins 28 August — Jackson Hole, the chair's first — as the inflection. The instruction to clients is to “retreat/rotate from risk assets rather than reload until higher inflation and one of those nasty ‘higher yields-lower dollar’ vigilante events forces monetary & fiscal policy U-turns.” He names Asian FX intervention the week's most important event. Sunday was otherwise near-silent across the sell side, which makes this note load-bearing.
Maintains its year-end S&P target of 8,000, roughly eight percent above the 30 July close. The argument is mechanical rather than fundamental: the firm's long/short momentum factor recently hit its highest volatility in decades outside a recession, which historically follows three-month rallies of twenty percent or more, and the deleveraging already done by hedge funds and ETF holders points to diminishing rotational turbulence. The bear and the bull here are not arguing about growth — they are arguing about whether three weeks of turbulence discharged the risk or announced it.
Reports CTA de-risking in the Nasdaq “appears largely complete”: Nasdaq-100 short-term trend strength has fallen to 13% against 53% for the S&P, so the systematic book has far more room to re-accumulate index tech than to sell it, “potentially adding fuel to any rebound.” Hedgers are net short roughly 6,600 contracts near spot, with gamma in the twenty-ninth percentile of the past year and falling as the July expiry rolls off. Thin gamma turns a level into a gap.
Frames the semiconductor drawdown as a fork rather than a dip. Semis have corrected more than twenty percent off the peak with fifty-day breadth “thoroughly washed out”, and his best guess is bear market or consolidation: “I struggle to see the catalysts” for a resurgence. He notes the S&P finished July down 0.1% while the equal-weight index rose 0.9% and the Nasdaq fell 6.6%. On Korea he is blunt — Friday's 17.91% gain still leaves the KOSPI 27% off its peak.
Is buying the drawdown Thomas is warning about. This morning's sector call is titled “Information Technology Is On Sale”, tagged to semiconductors and hyperscalers, alongside a global call that damage from the AI and war shocks “has been minimal.” His macro frame moved too: the soft second-quarter GDP headline was an illusion driven by surging imports, and the economy is AI-powered and “G-shaped”. The caveat is his own — the same forces propping up growth also push inflation higher.
| Voice | Stance | The shift |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Hartnett BofA | RETREAT | From tactical caution to an explicit instruction to rotate out of risk |
| Goldman Sachs US equity strategy | TARGET HELD | Rotational volatility called past its peak |
| BofA Securities systematic flows | FLOW | Nasdaq CTA selling declared finished; capacity now on the buy side |
| Ed Yardeni Yardeni Research | BUY TECH | From Fed-credibility critique to an outright sector call on the drawdown |
| Callum Thomas Topdown Charts | BEAR/CONSOL | Washed-out semis read as a fork, not a bottom |
| BofA Securities European equity strategy | MOMENTUM UW | Miners and construction materials upgraded to marketweight |
| Mohamed El-Erian Allianz | DISPERSION | The 2026 theme has migrated inside the technology complex |
| Jim Bianco Bianco Research | HAWK | Rejects yield-curve-control chatter; sceptical the Hormuz “deal” is one |
| Jeffrey Gundlach DoubleLine | FISCAL | Debt path reframed as the binding constraint on the long end |
| Charlie Bilello Creative Planning | LONG-END | Month-end thirty-year print read as the verdict on inflation |
| Otavio Costa Crescat Capital | RATES | After the yen, expects Treasuries next |
| Ryan Detrick Carson Group | EARNINGS | Revision breadth as the bull case the index level hides |
| Cem Karsan Kai Volatility | FRAMING | Reads the chair as posture, not policy |
| Mike Wilson Morgan Stanley | DARK | Nothing since 28 July, into a payrolls week |
| Andrew Tyler JPMorgan Market Intelligence | DARK | Last monitor 27 July; its buy signal unrefreshed |
| Savita Subramanian BofA | DARK | Silent through the AI-capex reset |
| Jonathan Krinsky BTIG | DARK | No note into a week that turns on levels |
| Tom Lee Fundstrat | DARK | Absent from a tape he is normally first to price |
The long end is the pressure point. Charlie Bilello framed the thirty-year's 2007-era month-end close as the bond market contradicting the official inflation story. Jim Bianco went further, pushing back on chatter about yield-curve control: he grants there might be “some version of Yield Curve Control (YCC) or other government intervention to hold down interest rates,” but insists what is unsettling the market is inflation, and suppressing the yield treats the symptom. He was replying to Otavio Costa, who flagged mortgage rates approaching seven percent and argued that after the yen, Treasuries are next. Behind it sits Jeffrey Gundlach's arithmetic: the national debt exceeds forty trillion dollars before Halloween on his projection, with tax take plus deficits near forty percent of GDP.
The yen is where theory met the tape. Mohamed El-Erian's framing of Friday's joint intervention is the useful one: the United States has broken more than a decade of not intervening in currency markets, and the open question is what that precedent implies for every other price the official sector decides is disorderly. His 2026 dispersion theme has, on his reading, migrated inside the technology complex.
China printed weak and nobody cared. Official July manufacturing PMI fell to 49.2 from 50.3 against a consensus of 50.0, ending four months of expansion, with non-manufacturing at 49.0, weakest since December 2022. The offset is policy — last week's Politburo meeting pledged faster fiscal spending and shifted monetary language to “moderately loose”, which is why copper is bid and the Hang Seng rose five straight sessions for its best week since September 2025. Meanwhile OPEC+ is lifting output targets by 188,000 barrels a day from September — a supply story invisible while the strait was the story, and now the second reason crude sits where it does.
Second-quarter earnings have been revised in a way that makes the headline unusable. Ryan Detrick's count is the sharpest illustration: three weeks ago communication services and consumer discretionary were expected to deliver EPS growth of 7.3% and 5.0%; those estimates now stand at 109.8% and 90.7%. Separately, S&P constituents with more revenue outside the United States than inside have delivered 74.7% earnings growth this quarter — a dollar story wearing an earnings costume. Aggregate earnings track roughly 29.3% adjusted year-on-year; strip one search-platform gain and one retailer's other income and it is closer to 28.8%, with the average surprise falling from 31.4% to 9.2%. The tape is trading the adjusted number, not the headline.
Sector dispersion is the actionable version. BofA's European equity desk reports high-momentum stocks there fell fourteen percent relative to the market in July, reversing a twenty-three percent first-half outperformance, on AI-monetisation doubts and a sharp rise in hyperscaler funding costs. It stays underweight momentum and semiconductors but sees further downside as more limited, and has upgraded mining and construction materials to marketweight. Its warning carries forward: hyperscaler weakness has historically preceded softness in AI-capex beneficiaries by months, not weeks.
Mega-cap technology has no fresh headline this morning, which leaves Friday's split setting the tone — Amazon up 15.32% on a capex guide the market chose to reward, Alphabet up 6.73%, Apple down 7.35% despite a revenue beat and a twenty-two percent iPhone gain. Three reactions, one day, one theme, and nothing in that session's index close communicates any of it.
The 29 July meeting held the funds rate at 3.50–3.75% for the fifth consecutive time on a 9–3 vote — and all three dissents wanted a twenty-five basis point increase, on inflation having run above target for more than five years. It was the first triple same-direction dissent since September 2016. Forward guidance has been stripped from the statement, so the dissent count is now the guidance, and the market reads it accordingly: December carries a one-in-three chance of fifty basis points of cumulative tightening rather than twenty-five.
Cem Karsan's reading of the chair is the most useful framing published over the weekend precisely because it is not a rate call: “People need to start seeing Warsh for who he is… He's simply the Bad Cop in a GOOD COP/BAD COP negotiation w/ the public & markets.” Accept it or not, it identifies the actual uncertainty. This is a Fed that has removed its own signalling apparatus, leaving the market to infer intent from posture — which is why Jackson Hole has become the fixed point every desk is navigating toward, and why this week's three speakers matter more than a mid-August schedule usually would.
The near-term mechanism runs through supply, not speeches. Treasury publishes financing estimates this afternoon and the refunding lands Wednesday, when the size and duration mix of issuance is tested against a five-and-a-quarter percent long bond. The curve carries an oddity into it: the twenty-year sits marginally above the thirty-year — a supply artifact rather than a growth signal, and Wednesday is where it resolves or gets worse.
Crude is down about 5.8%, but gasoline futures fell only 3.29%. Hormuz is a transit chokepoint, and transit risk prices most directly in the products that move through it and in the refining margin between the two. If the market believed the strait reopens on schedule, the crack should have compressed at least as hard as the barrel. It compressed less — the physical side is still charging for delivery risk the flat price has written off.
As of 1 August the NAAIM Exposure Index — the weekly read on how levered active managers actually are — moved to subscription-only access. The last public print is 22 July. This desk carries that stale figure with its date attached rather than quietly refreshing it, but the broader point deserves stating: the free positioning stack independent research has leaned on for a decade is being enclosed one gauge at a time. A number that has stopped updating does not stop appearing in other tables.
Gold and silver both finished the overnight essentially flat. On a tape where crude gave back its war premium and Dow futures added five hundred points, the metals should have been the cleanest expression of risk coming off — and they gave up nothing. Either the bid is no longer geopolitical but monetary, tracking the same fiscal arithmetic that drives the long bond, or the physical market does not believe the strait reopens. Both point the same way: the metals are pricing something the equity tape has decided is resolved.
Everything in front of the bell is a policy decision that could be reversed by lunchtime: a strike called off, a currency bought, a fiscal pivot announced. Equities have repriced all three as if they were data. The bond market has not, and the metals have not. Between those positions sits a hundred-point band where two models agree on the ceiling, and futures already above it. That is the geometry of the open, and it is where the argument gets settled today.
Cannon Trading Company
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572