The funds market carries no probability of a cut in September and roughly sixty percent odds of a hike. All three dissents at the July meeting were for tightening. So the reflex that a good jobs number is a good tape has the sign backwards this morning — and on the same morning, the most-watched contrarian gauge on Wall Street printed its highest reading in five years.
| Instrument | Last | Chg | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-mini S&P Sep ES | 7,751.00 | +16.25 | Prior settle 7,734.75. Trading above its daily pivot. |
| E-mini Nasdaq Sep NQ | 29,643.00 | +154.75 | Leading. Composite back above its 50-day. |
| E-mini Dow Sep YM | 54,056 | +43 | Cash snapped its record streak Thursday. |
| E-mini Russell Sep RTY | 3,019.80 | +10.70 | Cash closed 3,001.55. The payroll-sensitive one. |
| S&P 500 cash Thu close | 7,709.96 | −0.18% | Closing record 7,736.52, Aug 4. Intraday 7,793.68, Aug 5. |
| 2-year Treasury | 4.235% | −1.0bp | The rate market's hike tell. Flat into the print. |
| 10-year Treasury | 4.662% | −0.8bp | 2s10s +42.7bp. DXY 99.98, EURUSD 1.1530. |
| 30-year Treasury | 5.210% | −0.2bp | The long end will not rally. |
| Gold spot | 4,324.29 | +2.01% | Bid alongside equities, not against them. |
| WTI Sep | 76.86 | −0.56% | Settled 77.29, +2.75%. |
| Bitcoin | 65,094 | +1.11% | Roughly 48% under its 52-week high, with the S&P 1% under a record set Tuesday. |
| Gauge | Reading | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| BofA Bull & Bear Indicator | 9.7 | SELL ZONE From 9.4. Highest since 2021. |
| AAII bull / bear | 37.0 / 38.0 | Spread −1.0. Fear & Greed at 60, greed but not an extreme. |
| VIX | 15.22 | No fear priced into a binary morning. |
| Net dealer gamma | +$48.5bn | POS GAMMA Thursday's close. Spot sits about 220 points above the flip — deeply vol-suppressing. Levels in section 04. |
| Equity ETF net issuance | +$39.9bn | From $20.8bn prior. Mid and small in, mega-cap core out. |
| S&P above 50-day / 200-day | 64% / 69% | From 48.5% and 51.3% in late July. Real broadening. |
The flow read carries a contradiction worth naming. In the week to Aug 5 money went into everything at once — $32.9bn to equities, $23.1bn to bonds, and a colossal $53.7bn into money funds — and it is that indiscriminate appetite, plus tighter high-yield spreads, that drove the contrarian gauge to a five-year high. The composition of the equity money, though, is defensive in a way the headline hides: mid- and small-cap value took in more than ten billion while mega-cap core vehicles bled. The exposure, not the opinion, is what is stretched.
| Time ET | Event | Cons. | Prior |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08:30 | Non-farm payrolls, July | +85K | +57K |
| 08:30 | Unemployment rate, July | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| 08:30 | Average hourly earnings, m/m | +0.3% | — |
| 08:30 | Average hourly earnings, y/y | +3.5% | — |
| 10:00 | Richmond Fed's Barkin, NABE fireside | — | — |
| 15:00 | Consumer credit, June | — | — |
Street estimates run wide — LPL +75K, Fifth Third +90K, Wells Fargo +95K, Barclays +100K — and both LPL and Cannon's own desk preview look for the jobless rate at 4.3% rather than unchanged.
Positive gamma normally means a print gets absorbed rather than trended. The qualifier today is that both walls sit close — the put wall is roughly 10 cash points beneath spot and the call wall roughly 40 above — so the absorption band is unusually narrow for a payroll Friday.
| Sep contract | S2 | S1 | Pivot | R1 | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ES E-mini S&P | 7,698.42 | 7,719.08 | 7,744.92 | 7,765.58 | 7,791.42 |
| NQ E-mini Nasdaq | 29,046.67 | 29,297.08 | 29,491.67 | 29,742.08 | 29,936.67 |
| YM E-mini Dow | 53,511 | 53,773 | 54,225 | 54,487 | 54,939 |
| RTY E-mini Russell | 2,984.50 | 2,997.20 | 3,019.10 | 3,031.80 | 3,053.70 |
| GC Gold, Dec | 4,234.33 | 4,269.97 | 4,316.83 | 4,352.47 | 4,399.33 |
| CL Crude, Sep | 73.12 | 75.43 | 76.88 | 79.19 | 80.64 |
| SI Silver, Sep | 59.93 | 60.94 | 62.13 | 63.14 | 64.33 |
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +24.79 | Role in today's tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 7,750.00 | 7,774.79 | Ceiling. Splits R1 and R2, and the level a hot print must clear before dealer hedging works with the move. |
| Max pain | 7,650.00 | 7,674.79 | Today's expiry magnet, and two points from the pivot grid's S3 at 7,672.58. |
| Put wall | 7,700.00 | 7,724.79 | Floor — the first level where dealer hedging works with a decline rather than against it. Sits essentially on top of S1 at 7,719.08. |
| Gamma flip | 7,490.78 | 7,515.57 | Regime boundary, roughly 220 points and 2.9% beneath spot. The book is emphatically long gamma; nothing today plausibly reaches it. |
The confluence in the two tables above is unusually tight, and it is worth stating plainly. September ES carries a 24.79-point premium to cash, and translating the options book across at that basis lands the put wall within six points of the pivot grid's S1 and max pain within two points of S3 — from two methods that share no inputs. One is built from yesterday's range, the other from where dealers actually carry inventory.
Agreement does not make either method correct. It means that if the tape trades through one of those prices, two separate mechanical bids stop defending at once — the condition under which a positive-gamma morning stops absorbing and starts moving. Above spot the first genuine test is ES 7,765; cash moving averages sit far below at 7,688.96, 7,531.33 and 7,495.41, so no trend structure is threatened by a bad morning.
One qualifier, stated rather than glossed. The flip above is a fresh read from a widely-followed dealer gamma model, and other models put it between 7,475 and 7,630 this week — so treat it as a band around 7,500 rather than a hard line. The direction is not in doubt, and the vol-suppression it implies is why a binary print may land smaller than it deserves to.
The Flow Show published this morning and the indicator moved up rather than settling. The drivers are not equity euphoria — they are high-yield inflows, tighter high-yield and AT1 spreads globally, and improving breadth outside the United States. That is the awkward part: the gauge is at a five-year extreme because the credit market is behaving well, not because anyone got carried away in stocks.
His instruction is unchanged and now carries a fresher date: retreat and rotate rather than reload, into duration, defensives and staples, high-dividend equities, REITs, small caps, biotech and the US dollar. The trigger he has named repeatedly is the Fed being forced to restore credibility through aggressive hikes, with Jackson Hole flagged as the date.
A two-day reversal, both halves on the record. On Aug 3 he told CNBC he expected strength in semis and the momentum trade in early August. On Aug 5 he wrote to clients that the S&P's climb of more than 5% over the four sessions ending Aug 4 has occurred only three other times in thirty years — April 1999, March 2000 and November 2020 — and the March 2000 instance arrived one day before the dot-com peak. His framing of the bull case is the line to carry: "The bulls will hope it's November 9, 2020. We have our doubts."
His objection is to the mechanism, not the level: "the market has been playing musical chairs as money has sloshed from momentum, to value, and now back to momentum." His illustration is Microsoft, up nearly 27% across those four sessions after falling roughly 37% over the eleven months from its July 2025 peak. A move that size in a mega-cap over four days is not a re-rating; it is a positioning event.
No directional change, but he has put a number and a month on it. The target went out on the wire at 9:15 AM Thursday — 7,900 to 8,000 this month — six hours before he said it on Closing Bell alongside Solus's Dan Greenhaus. His case is technical momentum, accelerating earnings and broadening strength: the Nasdaq-100 above its 20-, 50- and 200-day averages, leadership widening into software, memory and digital assets.
Two things to hold against it. His standing forecast of a 10–20% drawdown across August to October did not resurface anywhere this week. And his own firm puts $18.44 of second-quarter S&P earnings per share in "investment gains" rather than operations, with organic growth around 21–22% against 13% a year ago — strong, but not the headline number. Section 10 returns to the gap.
The observation nobody else made this week, posted Thursday evening: "Noone's talking about both REITS and Utilities breaking down sharply this week." He describes a violation of the rising 40-week moving average, with relative charts against equal-weighted S&P worse still, at their lowest in years. His daily note separately reads the index constructively — a two-day consolidation he calls buyable, with the Nasdaq ETF likely to test all-time highs in August.
Both halves matter and they do not conflict: the index is fine, the defensive complex underneath it is not. Note that Newton and Tom Lee sit at the same firm and are calling different things — "Fundstrat says" is not a usable attribution today.
Published at 4:22 this morning, the earliest substantive item on the board: AI capital expenditure is building at roughly twice the pace the housing boom did, from 1.4% to 3.1% of GDP, about 0.85 points a year. The point is not that the spend is unjustified, but that a build-out constructed at that speed can be unwound at that speed, and the dependence on it was assembled inside two years. Private business investment in AI-related categories rose roughly $300bn year-over-year last quarter to a record $1.5 trillion annualised — the growth engine doing the work the labour market is not.
The cleanest positioning work of the week, and it lands on a split. Sentiment surveys are subdued; exposure is not. Margin debt as a share of nominal GDP is at an all-time high, matching the peaks of 2000, 2007 and 2021, with household equity allocations near records — while retail is de-risking and funds and systematic strategies hold conviction, the opposite of the usual pattern. Their contrarian signal cuts the other way: a widely followed ETF speculation index flipped from extreme optimism to extreme pessimism inside two weeks, generating a buy signal. Separately this morning, Gordon and colleague Collin Martin name today explicitly as a "good news is bad news" print.
| Voice | Stance | Position & what changed |
|---|---|---|
| Michael HartnettBofA | BEAR | Sell signal deepened this morning. Retreat and rotate, with a forced Fed as the trigger. |
| Mike WilsonMorgan Stanley | BULL | Target 8,000, sourced Aug 3, unchanged. "The rotation towards quality has begun, and I don't view that as a bearish development." On semis: "Semis may bounce, but they are unlikely to be the leader again." |
| Tom LeeFundstrat | BULL | Sharpened to a month and a range rather than a year-end number. Drawdown warning dormant. |
| Scott RubnerCitadel Securities | BULL | "July did not change the structural bull market. It reset it." Tech retail selling exceeded prior records by more than 80%. |
| Jonathan KrinskyBTIG | BEAR | Reversed within two days. The momentum complex now carries a top-like signature. |
| Ed YardeniYardeni Research | BULL | 8,250 year-end, street high, unchanged. The Fed should be tightening and equities are fine anyway. See section 09. |
| Torsten SløkApollo | CAUTIOUS | New this morning on the speed of the AI build-out and the symmetry of an unwind. |
| Ellen ZentnerMorgan Stanley WM | DOVISH | NEW No hike. The most contrarian rates call on the board. See section 09. |
| Mark NewtonFundstrat | BULL | Constructive on the index. Alarmed about REITs and utilities. |
| Katie StocktonFairlead Strategies | BULL | Turned constructive Aug 5: index out of consolidation, more breakouts, momentum favours adding exposure. |
| Andrew KreiCrescent Grove Advisors | BULL | NEW "Momentum trade still has legs" — the direct counterpoint to Krinsky, one day apart. |
| James TaylorTaylor Group of Wells Fargo Advisors | BULL | NEW Breadth of earnings "is really the story right now." A private-wealth practice, not a research desk. |
| Subramanian & HarveyBofA; CIBC | BEAR | The street lows, both stale: 7,100 and 7,450 for year-end, roughly 610 and 260 points beneath spot. Neither has been revised. |
| Pressure | State | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Labour | DETERIORATING | Three consecutive soft signals into today: June's miss, the April–May revisions, and Wednesday's private-payroll read at little over half consensus. |
| Inflation | STICKY | Second-quarter price deflators ran 3.8% and 3.3% year-over-year, core PCE the latter. June's monthly core came in at +0.1% against +0.2% expected — the one encouraging print in the set. |
| Growth | MODEST | Q2 real GDP +1.5%. The level is not the problem; the composition is, with the AI build-out carrying an outsized share. |
| Energy | EVENT RISK | Hormuz. Thursday ran slip-then-jump — early weakness on Iran–Oman progress, then a 4% surge after Iran's Fars News reported legislation under review to bar vessels of the US, Israel and other "hostile" nations, with fines up to 20% of cargo value. Brent settled 82.49, WTI 77.29; both give a little back this morning. |
| Dollar | CONTESTED | Firmer after its worst week in three months. Treasury is pushing the Fed to widen the FIMA repo facility to support Japan's currency defence. No new tariff action. |
| Overseas | SUPPORTIVE | Shanghai +1.0% on Chinese exports up 24% year-over-year; Hang Seng +0.5%, Nikkei −0.1%. Europe firm: DAX +0.7%, FTSE +0.5%, Stoxx 600 +0.24%. |
| Natural gas | WEAK | Near a three-month low around $2.64 on record production of 110.7 billion cubic feet a day — a disinflationary offset nobody mentions alongside the crude story. |
The map carries a contradiction the payroll print will start to resolve. The labour side has produced three soft readings in a row — normally a rate-cut sequence. The inflation side has produced deflators a committee with three hawkish dissenters cannot ignore. The funds market has settled that argument entirely in favour of inflation, and if today's number is soft enough that settlement gets tested for the first time since the July meeting.
| Name | Move | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| The Trade Desk TTD | −27.5% | Revenue $715m against $751m expected, and a third-quarter guide of "at least $650m" against $805m consensus — a 12% year-over-year decline. The finance, marketing and commercial chiefs were all replaced the same day. A guidance miss plus a simultaneous management clear-out is a different event. |
| Atlassian TEAM | +30% | Revenue $1.8bn, up 28%, cloud up 31%. The asterisk: fiscal 2027 guided to roughly 13% growth. The market is paying for the quarter, not the guide. |
| Cloudflare NET | +15% | Revenue $696.1m, up 36%, full year raised. Infrastructure software is where the beat rate is holding. |
| Doximity & Airbnb DOCS, ABNB | +71%, +8% | The largest single-name move on the board, and a discretionary beat — $1.37 against $1.25 — into a soft labour tape. |
| Memory & storage WDC, SNDK, MU, STX | −6 to −16% | Western Digital and SanDisk both beat and were sold on guidance against year-to-date gains of 469% and 202%. A positioning unwind, not an earnings failure — and the AI hardware fault line has moved from graphics processors to memory. |
| SpaceX | Unlock | 911.5 million shares, roughly $101bn, unlocked Thursday, taking the float from 4.9% to 11.8%. The stock popped more than 6% intraday and gave most of it back, and a further 455.8 million shares stay locked because the price is beneath the $135 offer. Dan Ives of Yorkville Ives, on Closing Bell: investing in it is a bet on Musk. |
The structural bid underneath all of this is mechanical rather than fundamental. Whatever today's number does to the rate market, corporate buyback eligibility widens from roughly 45% of the index by weight to 85% over the next ten sessions. The largest reliable buyer of US equities is coming back on line, and it does not read the payroll report.
| Metric | Level | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Fed funds target | 3.50–3.75% | Effective rate 3.63%. |
| September FOMC, hike | ~60–65% | Sep 16 meeting. |
| September FOMC, cut | 0.0% | The number that defines this morning. |
| July FOMC vote | 9–3 hold | All three dissents were for a hike. |
| Jackson Hole | Aug 28 | Chair Warsh speaks. Flagged by both cases as the pivot date. |
Ed Yardeni published at 10:50 Thursday night, and it is the clearest statement of the hawkish case on the board. It is built on reporting that Warsh is "prepared to raise interest rates at September's meeting if inflation readings released in coming weeks are hot." Yardeni's answer is that they already are. On the chair: "He has been unequivocal about his commitment to restore price stability. He just hasn't done anything about it so far. Nor has he provided any information about the Fed's reaction function under his leadership." On the signal he trusts: "We've been monitoring the 2-year Treasury yield, which is unambiguously calling for rate hikes." On whether Jackson Hole clears anything up: "We doubt it."
Six hours earlier, on Closing Bell, Ellen Zentner of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management answered the same question in seven words — "The Fed is not going to hike" — in a segment framed explicitly around the hike risk. She sits at Wealth Management, not Morgan Stanley Research, so this is not the house view carrying Wilson's index target. The whole disagreement fits in one window: one strategist says the committee will not hike, another says the chair's own aides are signalling it might, and the funds market has sided decisively with the second.
What makes it tradeable rather than academic is that Yardeni's chosen instrument went into the print essentially flat. The market he says is unambiguously calling for hikes has not moved ahead of the data that would confirm it. The front end expresses conviction first, and it is currently expressing none.
The September probability above is given as a range because the funds futures strip and the probability model sit about five points apart this morning. The last officially published print earlier this week fell inside that range.
Every desk note this morning frames the print the same way: a soft number is bad for growth, a strong number is good for the economy but bad for rates. Both readings treat the labour data as the variable and the Fed as the reaction. Hartnett's bear case runs the other direction. His stated trigger has never been a recession — it is the Fed being "forced to restore credibility via aggressive hikes." He wants the tightening. A hot payroll does not refute his position; it is the specific input that position has been waiting on since the spring.
The sequencing is the part to hold onto: the gauge went to its five-year extreme before the trigger arrived, not after. If today runs hot, the two halves of that thesis line up for the first time, three weeks ahead of Jackson Hole.
The rotation instruction is nearly universal among the cautious: out of momentum, into duration, defensives, high-dividend equities and REITs. It is the natural expression of a hike-risk print, and it is where a lot of money goes if 8:30 runs hot. Mark Newton spent Thursday evening pointing out that the destination is already broken — a violated 40-week moving average and relative charts at multi-year lows, on the evening before the print that would send money there.
The implication is not that Newton is right and Hartnett wrong. It is that rate-sensitive defensives are a poor hiding place from a rate shock, and the flow has been pre-committed to them anyway. A 30-year at 5.21% that will not rally is the same statement in a different market.
The strongest leg of the bull case this week is earnings, carried by an extraordinary set of figures: 61% of the index reported, an 86% beat rate, a record aggregate surprise of 31.4%, blended growth of 47.4%. James Taylor went on Closing Bell to say the breadth of that beat "is really the story right now," and on the surface he is describing something real.
The same data set carries a second number almost nobody quotes. Excluding one-off gains at two companies, blended growth is 28.8%. A Goldman desk note on Thursday made the structural version of the argument — that much of the record growth is mark-to-market appreciation on large technology firms' equity stakes rather than operating profit. Fundstrat arrives in the same place from the bullish side by a different route.
That is still excellent growth, but it is a different animal from forty-seven, and the gap is not a rounding issue — it is the difference between an operating boom and a mark-to-market one, with a forward multiple of 19.6 sitting on top. The breadth argument and the earnings-quality argument are reading the same spreadsheet to opposite conclusions, and only one of them is on television.
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572