The entire raise came from earnings; the multiple was held exactly where it was. That restraint is the interesting part, because the earnings figure sitting underneath every 8,000 target on the street just did two things at once — it set an all-time record, and it lost more than a third of its size the moment two companies are stripped out.
| Instrument | Last | Chg | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-mini S&P Sep ES | 7,785.75 | +6.50 | Implied open −4.89. |
| E-mini Nasdaq Sep NQ | 29,911.25 | +76.50 | The board leader. Implied open +48.95. |
| E-mini Dow Sep YM | 54,084 | −68 | Implied open −102.93. |
| E-mini Russell Sep RTY | 3,035.40 | −6.20 | Cash at its all-time high. |
| S&P 500 cash Fri close | 7,757.64 | +3.58% wk | Record close, the 26th of 2026. Composite +5.19% on the week. |
| 2-year Treasury | 4.220% | +1.6bp | −8.7bp on the week, lowest since July 17. |
| 10-year Treasury | 4.664% | +0.6bp | −8.6bp on the week. 2s10s +44.4bp, essentially unchanged. |
| 30-year Treasury | 5.211% | +0.1bp | Did not join the front-end rally. Section 07. |
| Gold Dec GC | 4,396.2 | −3.50 | Settled 4,399.70. Roughly +7% on the week. |
| Silver Sep SI | 64.235 | +0.736 | Settled 63.50. Up about 10% on the week. |
| WTI Sep CL | 79.02 | +0.84 | Settled 78.18. Brent near 84.2 after −7% last week. |
| Dollar index DXY | 99.71 | +0.15 | Friday 99.56, a three-month low. EUR/USD 1.1550, USD/JPY 158.80. |
| VIX | 15.45 | +0.55 | Friday 14.90, −6.8% on the week. |
| Gauge | Reading | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| BofA Bull & Bear Indicator | 9.7 | SELL ZONE Highest since 2021. |
| AAII bull / neutral / bear | 37.0 / 25.0 / 38.0 | Spread −1.0, up 10.1 points — surveyed before payrolls. |
| CNN Fear & Greed | 64 | GREED From 59 midweek. Not an extreme; 2026's range is 14 to 71. |
| CBOE put/call, total / equity | 0.76 / 0.54 | 34th percentile. No hedging demand into CPI week. |
| Net dealer gamma, SPX | +$55.02bn | POS GAMMA Deeply vol-suppressing. Levels in section 04. |
The positioning carries the contradiction worth naming. In the week to Aug 4, asset managers sat on a net long of 935,057 E-mini S&P contracts and barely moved it, while leveraged funds added 75,139 shorts to carry a net short of 316,802 — pressing into the days that produced a record close. Ten-year notes show the same shape, larger. Friday's record high came with fast money leaning the other way in both stocks and bonds: the fuel behind a squeeze rather than the signature of a crowd.
| When | Event | Prior | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon — | No scheduled US data | — | Bills only. |
| Tue 10:00 | Existing home sales, July | — | NFIB 06:00, NY Fed household debt, 3-year auction. |
| Wed 08:30 | July CPI, headline m/m & y/y | −0.4% / 3.5% | June's drop was the largest since April 2020. 10-year auction, OPEC monthly, Cisco after the close. |
| Wed 08:30 | July core CPI, m/m & y/y | 0.0% / 2.6% | Shelter rose 0.1% in June, the smallest since January 2021. |
| Thu 08:30 | July PPI · claims | — | 30-year auction. Hammack speaks 08:15, Barkin 08:40 — both July hawks. |
| Fri 08:30 | July retail sales | +0.2% | Michigan sentiment at 10:00. The consumer argument's first hard reading. |
Barclays' Pooja Sriram is the one named forecast on Wednesday: headline +0.16% and core +0.24% month over month, the upside entirely from services. She has the committee on hold into 2027 with risks skewed toward hikes. Scenario language below is descriptive, not a recommendation.
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +21.6 | Role in today's tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 7,760 | 7,782 | Ceiling — and ES has already traded through it overnight. Dealers sell into rips to defend this strike; a sustained break above is the classic tell the regime is turning. |
| Max pain | 7,650 | 7,672 | Expiration magnet — and it lands six points from Cannon's S3 at 7,678. |
| Put wall | 7,600 | 7,622 | Floor, a full 160 points beneath the call wall — a wide frame. |
Net dealer gamma sits at +$55.02bn at spot — deeply positive, the vol-suppressing configuration in which dealers are paid to fade pushes and buy dips. The regime line is nowhere near this week's range, so the magnitude is the read.
The confluence with Cannon's weekly grid is where this gets useful. That grid puts the September pivot at 7,763.00, R1 at 7,800.50 and S3 at 7,678.00. Translate the options book across the 21.6-point basis and max pain lands within six points of S3, while the call wall sits between the pivot and R1 — precisely where ES is trading. One method is built from last week's range, the other from where dealers carry inventory.
Agreement does not make either correct — it means that if the tape trades through one, two mechanical bids stop defending at once. The live question into Wednesday: ES is above the strike the dealer book is built to defend, with R1 overhead and the pivot the first thing that has to hold.
One correction worth carrying: this Friday is not monthly expiration. August's third Friday is the 21st, so the monthly gamma roll-off — the event that releases a pinned tape — sits a week beyond this week's data rather than on top of it.
| Structure | S&P 500 | Nasdaq 100 | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20-day average | 7,525.41 | 28,789.03 | Both well clear of it. |
| 50-day average | 7,494.24 | 29,369.30 | The Nasdaq's 50-day still sits above its 20-day — July's air pocket is still in the average. |
| 200-day average | 7,049.27 | 26,624.49 | Price sits 10.1% above the S&P's 200-day. Stretched, not broken. |
| Above the 200-day | 72.76% | — | Against a long-run average near 59%. Participation is broad. 14-day RSI 66.3 and 57.3. |
Eli's own weekly work frames the cash downside in order. The first thing to hold is the prior all-time high at 7,626 — a breakout only counts once the level it broke through starts acting as support. Beneath that the 20- and 50-day averages, then 7,431, 7,313 and 7,237. The VIX has support at 14.90, precisely Friday's close, then 12.70.
Breadth is real but not complete: 3,068 advancers against 1,679 decliners Friday, equal weight ahead of cap weight by 1.83 points on the year — yet the cumulative advance-decline line is still roughly 57,000 issues below its 2021 peak. The volatility curve is in full contango, the front future at 16.99 against spot — priced for calm now and trouble later.
On the wire at 2:19 AM ET. Year-end 2026 goes to 8,000 from 7,800, the second raise in two months after June took it from 7,600. Earnings per share go to $365 for 2026 and $420 for 2027, from $350 and $390. The forward multiple stays at roughly 20 times. The reasoning is specific to the cloud line rather than AI generally — "as elevated backlogs convert into recognized revenue, cloud growth should remain well supported, helping validate rising AI capex, strengthen order coverage, and further ease ROIC concerns" — and he names higher rates, geopolitical risk and the supply of new equity and debt as reasons not to pay more. A raise carried entirely by the earnings line, with the multiple pinned, is a bank saying the index deserves more money and not a higher price for the same money.
Friday lunchtime, and his first structural precious-metals call of 2026: "one of the more compelling upside setups we have seen in precious metals in months." Five things stacked, the fifth being the one nobody else is looking at — dovish front-end repricing, central-bank buying accelerating monthly, bullish options dynamics in the metal ETFs, retail capacity untouched because the AI trade absorbed everything, and trend followers net short in both gold and silver as of Aug 6. Skew is his tell: put-call skew in the gold ETF has inverted to its deepest since February. His equity stance is unchanged; the line to carry is still "July did not change the structural bull market. It reset it."
Sunday evening, the first dated rebuttal on memory. Renaissance Macro's Jeff deGraaf flagged signals of peaks in memory names in July, Citadel Securities recorded retail selling in semis and memory at more than five times any prior record — and nobody had answered. Lee answered: "I'm still bullish on semis and DRAM and memory – even though they're correcting, I think they're going to recover just like in '97 and '98." The leadership call underneath it is not a semis call, which is the part most summaries lose: "I think the recovery here is going to be led by the Magnificent Seven, software, and Ethereum."
The tension nobody at that firm addresses is four weeks old: his standing forecast of a 10–20% drawdown across August to October has not resurfaced while he has been calling 7,900 to 8,000 inside the month. He has not withdrawn it. He has stopped making it.
The number has not moved — the Bull & Bear Indicator sits at 9.7, the most extreme bullish reading since 2021, on high-yield inflows, tighter credit spreads globally and improving breadth outside the United States. But the framing sharpened over the weekend into something more honest than the headline: tactically bearish, strategically bullish, because policymakers treat the equity market as too big to fail and the economy depends on the wealth effect and the capex boom. That is a materially different claim from "sell" — the setup is stretched and the floor is political. The uncomfortable note attached: after the 2018, 2020 and 2021 peaks in this gauge, sentiment travelled from the upper extreme to the lower one inside a year.
Two notes Sunday, and the sector work is the useful one. "Information Technology led the S&P 500 sectors last week, up 7.2%." Then the line that argues against calling this a narrow melt-up: "The Financials, Health Care, and Industrials sectors all rose to record highs last week." He rates all three overweight and technology only marketweight — the week's leader is the sector he is least enthusiastic about. His 8,250 target was not restated; it carries because nothing contradicted it, not because he repeated it.
| Voice | Stance | Position & what changed |
|---|---|---|
| Dubravko Lakos-BujasJPMorgan | BULL | RAISED To 8,000 from 7,800 this morning. The move is all earnings; the multiple held at 20x. See section 05. |
| Michael HartnettBofA | BEAR | Tactically bearish, strategically bullish, the gauge at its five-year extreme. Nobody has engaged his argument; they have kept buying. |
| Mike WilsonMorgan Stanley | BULL | Target 8,000, his own words Aug 3. His named breaker: "the biggest risk to this consolidation turning into a correction is if the 10-year yields rise above 5%." On AI: the cycle is not over, but the easy money in the most crowded beneficiaries may be. |
| Tom LeeFundstrat | BULL | 8,000 year-end, 7,900–8,000 within August. Took the other side of the memory trade Sunday. Drawdown warning dormant four weeks. |
| Mark NewtonFundstrat | BULL | 8,000, raised from 7,300 on June 28. Sunday he withdrew a worry rather than raising a number: "I had some worries about tech continuing to be under pressure, but you have to really respect what's going on." |
| Scott RubnerCitadel Securities | BULL | NEW Equity stance intact; added his first structural precious-metals long of the year Friday. See section 05. |
| Ed YardeniYardeni Research | BULL | 8,250 year-end, still the street high. Overweight financials, health care, industrials and materials; technology only marketweight. |
| John FloodGoldman Sachs | BULL | NEW "Yes. The S&P 500 can hit 8,000." The supply-side case: record equity issuance absorbed because the corporate bid is larger. |
| Kostin & ChronertGoldman; Citi | BULL | 8,000 and 8,100 — but dated May 27 and June 8. Above the crowd, and there for months. |
| Jonathan KrinskyBTIG | UNSETTLED | His last two public items point opposite ways two days apart. No stance published here until a primary settles it. |
| Subramanian & HarveyBofA; Wells Fargo | OVERRUN | The street lows, 7,100 and 7,450, set in December 2025 and never revised. Not current calls — unrevised ones. |
Most of the names above now carry a year-end number of 8,000 or higher. That is the fact section 10 is about.
| Pressure | State | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Labour | DETERIORATING | July payrolls −23,000, unemployment 4.1%, hourly earnings +0.1% m/m and +3.2% y/y, May and June revised down a combined 103,000. Two consecutive weak months, wages soft enough that no wage-price spiral is available. |
| Inflation | THE OPEN QUESTION | June was the encouraging print. Wednesday tells you whether that was a turn or an energy artefact — the first reading the committee sees after three dissents for hiking. |
| Rates & supply | STUCK LONG | The front end rallied nine basis points and the thirty-year did not move. Hyperscaler issuance is the mechanical reason: Alphabet, Meta and Amazon alone have brought roughly $170bn of investment-grade paper this year against about $38bn in all of last year. |
| Energy | EVENT RISK | Hormuz is still closed. Brent fell more than 7% last week on reopening optimism and is bid again as that faded — Washington calls itself "only semi-negotiating," Tehran denies direct talks and wants the blockade lifted first. The gap is a transit fee: Iran wants 5–7% of cargo value, Oman has floated about 3%. |
| Yen & the dollar | CONTESTED | The joint US–Japan intervention of July 31 — the first coordinated operation since 1998 — took the currency off a forty-year low near 163.73. It is back through 158.80. Gains are fading against rate differentials, and the Bank of Japan's July minutes lean hawkish enough that a September hike there is live. |
| Overseas & fiscal | SUPPORTIVE | Nikkei +2.08% on AI and semis, though the broader Topix added only 0.44% — narrow and heavyweight-carried. China's July CPI slowed to +0.5%. The Senate passed a stopgap 90–6 Saturday funding to December 11, taking a pre-midterm shutdown off the board. The live tariff date is August 19, when 50% duties on Canada take effect. |
The map's contradiction is unchanged and Wednesday starts to resolve it. The labour side has produced two consecutive weak readings, which in any other cycle is a cutting sequence; the rate market has settled the argument on the inflation side. The long end, which ignored every soft labour print this summer, is the honest scoreboard.
| Name | Move | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Apple AAPL | −1.32% | The mega-cap story. Jefferies cut it to Underperform from Hold, target to $263.66 from $285.56, on the apparent cancellation of the 2027 all-glass handset. |
| Meta META | +2.54% | Leads the mega-caps on an open-weight model launch — the only one with a real bid. |
| Memory complex MU, SK Hynix, Samsung | −1.05% | The live argument, and Tom Lee took the other side Sunday. Micron trades about 30% below its June high at a forward multiple near six, with a Citi target cut to $1,150 from $1,400 on the view that memory prices peak next year, plus SanDisk's soft outlook and a $38bn SK Hynix fab commitment in one week. Korea rallied while both memory names fell. |
| The week's reporters CRWV, CSCO, AMAT | — | CoreWeave Tuesday, Cisco Wednesday, Applied Materials Thursday. |
The structural bid underneath the single names does not read the data: buyback authorisations run well ahead of last year, Berkshire alone resumed its own at $4.5bn, and the window is open for most of the index. Against that, leveraged funds carry a net short of more than 316,000 E-mini contracts. A light earnings week, a pinned book and a mechanical corporate bid facing a pressed short base drifts up on no news — and gaps on some.
| Metric | Level | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Fed funds target | 3.50–3.75% | Held July 29. |
| July FOMC vote | 9–3 hold | Hammack, Kashkari and Logan all dissented for a 25bp hike. |
| September FOMC, hike | ~44% | From 67% a week ago, all of it Friday's payroll number. |
| September FOMC, cut | 0% | No cut in this strip. |
| Priced through December | ~28bp | Of tightening, not easing. From 32bp pre-payrolls. |
| Next meeting | Sep 16 | Two CPI prints and Jackson Hole in between. |
| Jackson Hole | Aug 27–29 | Warsh's first. |
The single most important thing to hold about this tape is that the sign is inverted relative to the last decade. Every reflex trained on 2019 to 2024 says a weak labour print is bad news that becomes good news through the cut it invites. There is no cut here. A weak print is good news because it postpones a hike — precisely how Friday traded: payrolls negative, September tightening odds down more than twenty points, index at a record. Nothing about that sequence is a growth story.
Two dissenters speak Thursday and both are hawks: Cleveland's Beth Hammack, who voted to tighten in July, at 08:15 — fifteen minutes before the producer price release — and Richmond's Tom Barkin at 08:40. A hawk either side of an inflation print is the closest thing this week has to guidance, the chair having provided none since taking the seat. The rate market has picked a side at 44%: not conviction, a coin flip with a lean.
Most of the voices on this morning's board carry a year-end number of 8,000 or better, and the case each makes rests on the same quarter. With 88% of the index reported, the aggregate earnings surprise is 29.2% — the largest since the series began in 2008, against a previous record of 23.2%. Blended growth is 50.4%, from 23.1% at the end of June, the highest since 2021.
Now strip out two companies. Alphabet reported $9.11 against $2.88 estimated, carrying a $98bn gain in other income from unrealised marks on equity stakes; Amazon reported $5.75 against $1.82, carrying $53.4bn primarily from its investment in Anthropic. Take those two out and the record surprise falls to 10.9% and blended growth to 32.0%. A second vendor working from adjusted figures lands independently at 31.1% — the two are not in conflict, they are measuring the same thing with and without roughly $150bn of marks. And the part almost nobody says out loud: Anthropic is private. That valuation moves on funding rounds, not on the tape. It does not come back because equities fall, and it did not come back when they rose.
The second line crossed: the forward twelve-month multiple is now 20.0, above its five-year average of 19.9 — through its own mean while the earnings base underneath it loses more than a third of its size under inspection. Which is why JPMorgan holding the multiple and taking the whole raise through earnings per share is the most informative thing any bank did this morning. The most bullish new target on the street is also the one refusing to pay up.
Gold gained near 7% on the week to a seven-week high, silver roughly 10%, platinum 13% in seven sessions. And Citadel Securities' equity and equity-derivatives strategist — not a commodities analyst — put out the first structural precious-metals long of his year Friday, the fifth item on his list being that trend followers sat net short in both metals as of August 6.
So the metals had their best week of 2026 while systematic money was positioned against them, alongside a record equity close and a dollar at a three-month low. That is not the risk-off trade, and not the geopolitical hedge either — a genuine Hormuz premium would have taken crude with it, and Brent fell more than 7% the same week. What is left is debasement and dovish repricing, with an uncomfortable implication: the metal is pricing the same front-end move equities rallied on, but as a currency problem rather than a growth reprieve. One input, opposite readings — and the positioning gap says the second is still being underwritten.
Nvidia reports Wednesday August 26 at 5:00 PM ET. Jackson Hole opens Thursday August 27, Kevin Warsh's first as chair. The largest weight in the index prints its quarter the evening before the chairman gives the only extended remarks he will give before the September meeting. Most desks have both dates; almost nobody has put them on the same line. Whatever Nvidia says sets the risk appetite in which Warsh's words land, and there is no session in between to absorb either separately.
The complication is that the earnings dataset the whole 8,000 consensus rests on stops updating before then. There is no weekly earnings publication on August 14 or August 21; the next arrives August 28 — the morning after Nvidia. Three weeks arguing about a quarter with no new reading on it, then all of it inside thirty-six hours: a long quiet stretch in front of a very crowded exit.
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572