That is not indifference, it is machinery: dealers carry the widest long-gamma cushion this letter has recorded, and it absorbed a six-and-a-half percent oil day without a mark. The trouble with a cushion is that it tells you nothing about what it absorbed — and Wednesday's inflation print covers a month that ended before any of this happened.
| Instrument | Last | Chg | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-mini S&P Sep ES | 7,771.75 | −5.00 | Implied open −12.36. |
| E-mini Nasdaq Sep NQ | 29,725.75 | −11.25 | Implied open −31.05. |
| E-mini Dow Sep YM | 53,998 | −65 | Implied open −117.98, weakest of the four. |
| E-mini Russell Sep RTY | 3,024.70 | −0.30 | Cash about 1% under its record. |
| S&P 500 cash Mon close | 7,753.11 | −4.53 | 4.53 under Friday's record close. |
| Nasdaq 100 / Composite | 29,621.80 | −0.34% | Composite 26,605.36. Semis −2.9%. |
| Dow / Russell 2000 | 53,975.98 | −0.11% | Russell 3,017.40, −0.56%. |
| 2-year Treasury | 4.256% | +1.7bp | 63bp above the effective funds rate. Section 09. |
| 10-year Treasury | 4.729% | +3.1bp | 2s10s +47.3bp, steeper. |
| 30-year Treasury | 5.276% | +3.3bp | The instrument section 05 is about. |
| WTI Sep CL | 84.42 | +2.79% | Settled 82.13 Monday, +6.58% — the board’s biggest mover. |
| Brent Oct BRN | 89.99 | +2.59% | Settled ~87.72. Murban +6.6% — the Gulf grade leads. |
| Gold Dec / Silver Sep | 4,429.4 | +9.3 | Silver 64.90. Both rose with crude Monday: gold +1.05%, silver +3.35%. |
| Dollar index DXY fut | 99.765 | +0.06% | EUR/USD 1.1537, USD/JPY 159.30. |
| VIX / Bitcoin | 15.48 | +0.02 | Oil VIX 56.06, VXN 23.04. BTC 64,015. |
| Gauge | Reading | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Dealer gamma flip, SPX | 7,097.87 | POS GAMMA Cash sits 655 points above it. Levels in section 04. |
| CNN Fear & Greed | 65 | GREED From 60 a week ago. 2026's range is 14 to 71. |
| AAII bull / neutral / bear | 37.0 / 25.0 / 38.0 | Spread −1.0 — retail is not the crowded side. Surveyed to Aug 5. |
| CBOE put/call, total / equity | 0.86 / 0.61 | No hedging bid ahead of the print. |
| VIX curve, M1 / M2 | 16.96 / 18.60 | Full contango against spot — calm now, paid for later. |
| S&P above 50 / 200-day | 65.2% / 71.2% | Both fell Monday on a flat index — internals gave up more than the tape. BofA's Bull & Bear gauge holds at 9.7. |
Positioning keeps getting more extreme, not less. In the week to August 4 leveraged funds added 50,075 E-mini longs and 82,598 shorts at once, deepening a net short to 329,999 contracts while asset managers barely moved a net long of 937,033. Fast money is not short because it is bearish; it is short because it is carrying more of everything — the fuel behind a squeeze and the accelerant under a break.
| When | Event | Cons. / Prior | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 06:00 | NFIB small business optimism, July | 97.3 / 97.4 | Hiring intentions are the line that matters after −23,000. |
| Tue 08:15 | ADP weekly employment change | — | The high-frequency labour read between monthly prints. |
| Tue 10:00 | Existing home sales, July | 4.05M / 4.09M | NY Fed household debt at 11:00. Mortgage rates are the constraint, not inventory. |
| Tue 13:00 | 3-year note auction | prior 4.179% | First of three this week. The front end is the easy one; Thursday's bond is not. |
| Wed 08:30 | July CPI, headline m/m & y/y | +0.1% / 3.4% | Prior −0.4%, 3.5%. Ten-year auction 13:00, EIA 10:30. |
| Wed 08:30 | July core CPI, m/m & y/y | +0.2% / 2.5% | Prior 0.0%, 2.6%. Services is where forecasts disagree. |
| Thu 08:30 | July PPI · jobless claims | +0.2% / 201K | Hammack 08:15, Barkin 08:40. 30-year auction 13:00. |
| Fri 08:30 | July retail sales · Michigan | +0.2% / 54.0 | Michigan one-year inflation expectations, 4.2% prior — the survey most exposed to a pump price. |
Earnings are thin: Sea and Cardinal Health before the bell, CoreWeave and Super Micro after it. Scenario language below is descriptive of how desks and pricing frame outcomes, not a recommendation.
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +18.6 | Role in today's tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 8,000 | 8,019 | Ceiling, 3.2% overhead. Dealers have almost nothing to defend on the upside inside this week's plausible range. |
| Put wall | 7,600 | 7,619 | Floor, 2.0% below spot — the first level where a mechanical bid appears. |
| Gamma flip | 7,097.87 | 7,117 | Regime line. Cash closed 655 points above it — nowhere near flipping to short gamma. |
Read the frame, not the levels. Four hundred SPX points separate the walls and the regime line sits eight and a half percent below the tape — a very wide, very deep long-gamma book with almost no structure inside it. That is the configuration in which market makers are paid to fade every push both ways, and in which a six-and-a-half percent oil day produces a four-point index move. It is also a book that gives no warning: no strike between here and 7,600 switches mechanical support on.
Cannon's grid is tight where the options book is loose. The September pivot sits at 7,778.92, R1 at 7,794.83 and S1 at 7,759.83 — a thirty-five point band, and ES has spent the overnight below that pivot. Whether that pivot caps the tape or gets reclaimed is the first question of the cash session; S2 at 7,743.92 and S3 at 7,724.83 mark the range beneath.
The instrument with the real levels this morning is crude: Cannon's September WTI pivot is 80.75, R1 83.72, R2 85.28 — and it is trading through R1 and pressing R2. A market past R1 before the open has already spent its average day's range.
Read Cannon’s trend columns across rather than down. Exactly two markets on the whole board are negative on both the short- and long-term trend: the thirty-year bond and natural gas. Gold, silver and copper are short-term up, the equity contracts are up on both horizons, and crude carries no trend flag at all — a market that has moved too fast for a trend to have formed. The one instrument the board marks broken in both timeframes is the one section 05 names as the risk.
He sat with CNBC's Closing Bell at 3:43 PM ET Monday — a seat that opens for him roughly four times a year. The positioning number is the headline. He calibrates the trading community from minus ten to plus ten. The year's low was minus four in late March, in the Iran context; the high plus nine or better in late June, at the peak of the momentum factor. Today he puts it at plus six: July shed serious risk on both gross and net, and what is left is, in his word, cleaner. That is the whole bull case in one number — not that people are bearish, but that they have room.
On August: a quiet month in capital markets with no blockbuster IPO coming, against what is on average the best month of the year for buyback executions — and, from his own desk, “our activity in August is running two times normal.” He bounds it carefully: after a strong fortnight, risk-reward is “somewhere middle of the road.”
On breadth he refuses the framing. Every sector is positive on the year, the index is up 14%, and technology is the second-best performer behind energy — so the equal-weight-versus-cap-weight argument is really a debate about tech, and tech has performed fine. Nine of eleven sectors grew earnings at double digits in Q2, the median company by 14%. Broadening did not come at the expense of the biggest muscle group; it came on top of it.
Then the part that should change how you read the week. Asked what knocks the market over, he did not say the Fed — Goldman's house view, which he attributes to Jan Hatzius, is a committee on hold for about the next year. His answer was the back end, as a global debt-and-deficit story running through Japan, the UK and Europe. Section 10 carries the supply arithmetic and the analogue he attached to it.
Published into Monday afternoon from a note dated Sunday, and it is aimed somewhere unusual. Not at semis, where his July work sat, but at the equal-weight index — the broadening everyone has been calling healthy. “Our sense is a lot of buying has been done and the risk of an air-pocket is now much higher for the RSP. In other words, we don't see much juice left to squeeze.”
The frame is late 2021, when the index left a months-long sideways range with a 6% rally to a new 52-week high while high-beta momentum names were already 25% off their highs — a drawdown he calls “similar to what we are seeing right now.” “While history doesn't repeat, it often rhymes, and we think this recent ‘breakout’ is also likely to falter.” He puts no level and no time frame on it, which is unusually honest for a technician.
Monday's direct answer to the stretched-valuation argument, arithmetic attached. With 443 S&P companies reported, profits are up 51% year over year on revenue up 14.6%, against a bottom-up estimate of 23.6% entering the season; 86% have beaten.
The load-bearing line is valuation: the forward multiple at 20.3 times is only 0.5% above its five-year average and 12.9% below the 23.3 times this cycle has already paid. His title was “Stay the Course.” Set against Krinsky, the two are not arguing about the same thing — one measures what has been earned, the other what has already been bought.
| Voice | Stance | Position & what changed |
|---|---|---|
| Tony PasquarielloGoldman Sachs | CONSTRUCTIVE | ON AIR Positioning cleaner after July, foundation solid, the danger is the long end. Section 05. |
| Jonathan KrinskyBTIG | BEAR | SETTLED Last week's stance ambiguity closed by his own words. Aimed at the equal-weight index, not tech. Section 05. |
| John StoltzfusOppenheimer | BULL | NEW 8,100 year-end. “Stay the Course,” on a 51% earnings quarter and a multiple half a percent above its own average. |
| Ed YardeniYardeni Research | BULL | RESTATED 8,250 year-end and 10,000 by the end of the decade, with an 80% subjective probability on his Roaring 2020s scenario. His worry list argues the Fed should hike soon. Section 10. |
| Dubravko Lakos-BujasJPMorgan | BULL | 8,000, raised Monday from 7,800 on earnings alone with the multiple pinned at 20x. Unchanged since. |
| Mike WilsonMorgan Stanley | BULL | 8,000. His named breaker is a ten-year above 5%; it is at 4.729% and rising. |
| Tom Lee & Mark NewtonFundstrat | BULL | 8,000 both. Lee calls 7,900–8,000 inside August; his August–October drawdown warning is dormant five windows, unwithdrawn. |
| Michael HartnettBofA | BEAR | Bull & Bear Indicator 9.7, the extreme since 2021. Nought for three since Friday and unengaged by anyone. |
| John FloodGoldman Sachs | BULL | The execution desk's supply case for 8,000 — roughly $1.4tn of buybacks against a record $700bn of issuance, ~400 points above his own house strategist. |
| Helima CroftRBC Capital Markets | OIL RISK | NEW On CNBC Monday: strikes on Russian refining capacity create “deeper problems” than the Hormuz headline — a second, non-Iranian supply leg. |
| Subramanian & GolubBofA; Seaport | UNREVISED | 7,100 and 7,900, set months ago and never revised. Not current calls. |
Most of the rows above carry a year-end number of 8,000 or higher. The one genuinely new bearish voice this morning is a technician, and he is pointed at the part of the market everybody agrees is healthy.
| Pressure | State | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | REPRICING | Washington calls the Strait open and under its control; Tehran says it stays closed until the blockade, sanctions, troop presence and now war reparations are dealt with. Tanker traffic ran 8 to 15 vessels a day in early August against roughly 130 before the war. |
| Inflation | THE OPEN QUESTION | The first print the committee sees after three dissents to tighten — and a July print, which does not contain August's crude. The number that settles the September argument and the number reflecting the current shock are not the same number. |
| Rates & supply | BACKING UP | The whole curve rose Monday and the long end rose most, into three auctions in three sessions. Thursday's bond sale follows a hawkish dissenter and a producer price print. |
| Labour | DETERIORATING | July payrolls at −23,000 against expectations near +80,000, the second weak month running. In any other cycle that is a cutting sequence; here it is what took September hike odds from 67% to the mid-forties. |
| Overseas | MIXED | Tokyo closed for a holiday. Hong Kong −1.10%, Shanghai −0.82% as reopening hopes faded; Europe flat to lower. |
The map's tension changed shape since Friday. For two months the argument was whether a soft labour market could pull the long end down; it could not. Now a second force is pushing the same instrument the other way, and it arrives through the commodity rather than the data. A curve backing up on supply and energy at once, into three auctions and a CPI print, is a different setup from a curve that simply refuses to rally.
| Name | Move | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Intel INTC | −4.06% | Priced its upsized offering overnight: $20bn at $95 a share, raised from $15bn, about 210.5m shares, on a book reported above $100bn. The stock closed at 97.52 having broken $100 — the discount is the cost of the extra five billion. |
| Nvidia NVDA | −2.86% | 217.55, the heaviest weight in a semiconductor complex that fell 2.9% on a flat index day. Reports Aug 26, the evening before Jackson Hole opens. |
| Apple AAPL | — | Jefferies' Edison Lee cut it to Sell, target $263.66 from $285.56, on the cancelled twentieth-anniversary all-glass handset and long-run iPhone pricing growth cut to 6.8% from 9%. |
| Alphabet GOOGL | — | Intelligent Alpha's Doug Clinton disclosed on Closing Bell Monday that he has sold the position — an action rather than a view, and the only hard fact from that segment. |
| Energy complex XLE, RIG | +4.63% | The only place Monday's oil move showed up in equities. Transocean added 8.75%; offshore and services led rather than the majors — a supply trade, not a demand one. |
| Tonight's reporters CRWV, SMCI | — | Both reporting into a session where their end market sold off. |
The structural bid is what has absorbed all of this: the buyback window opens hardest through mid-August. A pinned book, a mechanical corporate bid and a pressed short base is a market that drifts up on no news — and gaps on the news it has not priced.
| Metric | Level | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Fed funds target / effective | 3.50–3.75% | Effective 3.63%. Held July 29. |
| July FOMC vote | 9–3 hold | Hammack, Kashkari and Logan all dissented for a 25bp hike. |
| September FOMC, hike | ~46% | From 67% a week ago. All of the move is the payroll print. |
| Next decision | Sep 16 | With projections. No cut anywhere in the strip. Blackout starts Sep 5 — officials speak freely all week. |
| Jackson Hole | Aug 27–29 | Kevin Warsh's first as chair, the day after Nvidia reports. |
Hold the sign. Every reflex trained on the last decade reads a weak labour print as bad news that becomes good news through the cut it invites. There is no cut here. Friday's negative payroll number was good news because it postponed a hike — which means this week's inflation print is not a referendum on how soon policy eases, but on whether it tightens at all.
The chair has said almost nothing about rates since taking the seat, which puts unusual weight on two hawks speaking Thursday: Cleveland's Beth Hammack, who voted to tighten in July, at 08:15, and Richmond's Tom Barkin at 08:40. A July dissenter handed the microphone fifteen minutes before a producer price release is the closest thing this week has to guidance. And forty-six percent is not conviction — it is a coin flip with a lean, into a print that lands first.
Ed Yardeni's worry list, published Monday night, argues the two-year sits about seventy-five basis points above the funds rate and reads that as the bond market telling the Fed to raise soon. Pasquariello, on air seven hours earlier, walked through the identical spread and called it something else: funds at three and five-eighths, the two-year a little north of four and a quarter, so “there's going to be a little bit of risk premium in the price, and I think that's fine.”
The arithmetic matters first: against the 3.625% effective rate the two-year's premium is sixty-three basis points, not seventy-five — roughly half a hike, sitting exactly where the argument is. Then the substance. One man reads a priced risk premium as an instruction the committee has not yet followed; the other reads it as a cushion already paid for, which is why he can put the Fed in the background of his risk list rather than at the top. They are not disagreeing about the data. They are disagreeing about whether a market that has already priced something is warning you or protecting you.
Everyone has the trillion dollars of AI capital expenditure. Almost nobody has traced how it gets funded. Pasquariello did, and the figures are the most useful thing he said: investment-grade issuance from the hyperscalers themselves — not project finance wrapped around a data centre, but debt on their own balance sheets — ran around $100bn last year, is tracking near $250bn this year, and Goldman expects roughly $400bn next year. His phrase for it was a step change, and the mechanism is simple: you are adding more and more duration to the assembly line, and it takes time to absorb.
That reframes the long end as something other than a deficit story: it makes the most crowded equity theme on earth a structural seller of the exact instrument its own valuation depends on. The precedent he reached for is October 2023, when the back end backed up about 110 basis points and, in his words, stuck a knife in the Nasdaq for two or three months before receding. He is explicit that this is not a here-and-now problem — and it is still the only thing he named when asked what could upset the market, which is a strange thing for the street to be filing as a rates-desk footnote.
Wednesday's release covers July. Crude's eight percent came in August. Gasoline is a direct headline input and energy passthrough is the mechanism every forecaster names as the difference between contained and broadening inflation — and none of it is in the number. The market gets a clean read on a period that pre-dates the shock, and it will trade that number as though it settled something.
Two things compound it. July is the last CPI the committee sees before a September decision three of its members already dissented on. And the machinery absorbing all of this — the four-hundred-point dealer frame in section 04 — is precisely what guarantees the market underreacts on the day. The pin is doing real work. It is doing it on stale information, ahead of a thirty-year auction, in the one week nobody gets a fresh reading on the variable that moved.
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572