Nine-day volatility closed nearly three points beneath spot — the options market is charging almost nothing for the event it is about to trade through. Meanwhile the two-year sits fifty basis points above the funds rate and September is priced as a toss-up on whether this Fed goes up. Both cannot be right, and only one of them settles at 8:30.
Cash closed roughly a hundred and sixty-eight points above the gamma flip. That is the character of this tape: dealers are long gamma, they sell strength and buy weakness, and Tuesday proved it again — mega-cap led the Nasdaq down, crude was bid on a live supply shock, and the index still gave up only a third of a percent while volatility went down.
The cushion holds until the print. Today delivers new information into a structure built entirely on stale information, with an auction four and a half hours behind it.
| Instrument | Last | Change | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| E-mini S&P, Sep #ES | 7,747.50 | −0.33% | Premium of 19.30 over cash. Second down day off the record. |
| E-mini Nasdaq, Sep #NQ | 29,626.00 | −0.45% | The drag: mega-cap led lower while the broad tape held. |
| Mini Russell, Sep #RTY | 3,027.12 | +0.32% | Cash index — the only major green Tuesday. |
| S&P 500 cash #SPX | 7,728.20 | −0.32% | Reference for every gamma level below. |
| VIX | 15.28 | −1.29% | Fell on a down day. SKEW 135.59. |
| 2-year / 10-year | 4.201 / 4.668% | −2.3 / −2.2bp | Curve at +46.7bp; the front end still trades above the funds rate. |
| 30-year | 5.221% | −1.9bp | Above 5.20% is a term-premium story, not a policy one. |
| Crude, Sep #CL | 83.20 | +1.46% | Brent 88.96, re-bid as Hormuz talks stalled. |
| Natural gas, Sep #NG | 2.77 | −0.90% | Negative on both trend horizons — one of only three markets that is. |
| Gold, Dec #GC | 4,441.10 | −0.43% | Silver 64.94, −1.50%. Both bid back hard overnight. |
| Copper #HG | 6.63 | −0.13% | Supply-driven bid: Congo export ban, Chilean disruption. |
| Dollar index / EUR / JPY | 99.83 | +0.02% | 1.1538 and 159.19. A levered CPI expression today. |
| Bitcoin #BRTI | 63,600 | −0.80% | Failed 64,000 again. Hike risk is the crypto story too. |
| Gauge | Reading | What it says | As of |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN Fear & Greed | 61 | Greed, but the boring part of greed — barely moved in a week. | Live |
| AAII bull / neutral / bear | 37.0 / 25.0 / 38.0 | Spread of −1.0. Retail is not the crowded side of this. | Week to Aug 5 |
| Investors Intelligence | 53.7 / 14.8 | Ratio 3.63, fewest bears since February. The advisors are. | Week to Aug 5 |
| CBOE put/call, equity / total | 0.63 / 0.81 | No hedging bid bought into the print. | Aug 11 |
| VIX curve, 9-day / M1 / M2 | 12.52 / 16.79 / 18.43 | Contango throughout; roll cost near 8.9% a cycle. | Aug 11 |
| September hike, implied | ~50% | A genuine coin flip — in the direction almost nobody positions for. | Live |
The flow read is a contradiction worth holding in one hand. In the week to August 4, leveraged funds flipped net long VIX futures — a sixteen-thousand-contract swing into the ninety-sixth percentile of the past year — while sitting short 73,931 Nasdaq contracts, the second percentile, near a record. Fast money bought the hedge and pressed the short. Meanwhile trend followers have rebuilt equity length, with meaningful selling only triggered beyond a four percent decline. The hedges are on, the trend is long, and the speculative short sits in exactly the index that led lower yesterday.
| When | Event | Cons. / Prior | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07:00 | MBA mortgage applications | — | Housing demand against a 5.2% thirty-year. |
| 08:30 | July CPI, headline m/m & y/y | +0.1% / 3.4% | Prior −0.4% and 3.5%. The monthly base effect will look worse than the trend. |
| 08:30 | July core CPI, m/m & y/y | +0.2% / 2.5% | Prior 0.0% and 2.6%. Cleveland's nowcast is on consensus to the decimal. |
| 10:30 | EIA crude, gasoline, distillates | −0.5M bbl | The API reported a 9.07-million-barrel build last night against that. Someone is wrong. |
| 13:00 | $42bn ten-year note auction | — | Tuesday's three-year drew a 2.71 cover against a 2.64 average. Demand is there for now. |
| 14:00 | Monthly Treasury budget, July | −$346bn | The supply arithmetic behind the long end. |
| — | Fed speakers | None | Not a blackout — simply nobody to interpret the print for you. |
The asymmetry sits in the positioning, not the distribution: a soft print unwinds two crowded bets at once, while a hot print lands on a structure built to absorb it. Identical surprises are not symmetric here.
| Level | SPX cash | ES Sep | What happens there |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 7,800 | ~7,819 | Heaviest call gamma. Cannon's R2 is 7,819.75 — the same wall, found two ways. |
| Prior close | 7,728.20 | 7,747.50 | Pivot at 7,761.75 sits between here and the wall. |
| Gamma flip | 7,560.58 | ~7,580 | Below it dealers amplify instead of absorbing. Roughly 2.2% away. |
| Put wall | 7,500 | ~7,519 | Deepest downside gamma, and beneath the flip — no cushion on the way there. |
The pivot at 7,761.75 is the first thing a soft print must reclaim; below, every Cannon support sits inside the positive-gamma zone — the technical way of saying the first flush gets bought by people with no opinion at all.
The volatility curve says the same thing from another angle. Three-month at 18.91 and six-month at 21.10 complete a steep, orderly contango that shifted down yesterday — sellers pressed into the event. With six sessions to expiry, the roll costs near nine percent a cycle, a punishing tax on anyone holding volatility as insurance rather than as a trade.
The trend columns are worth a moment. Only three markets on that board read negative on both the short- and long-term signal: the thirty-year bond, natural gas and the euro. Everything else — both equity indices, the metals, crude, bitcoin, the grains — carries at least one green arrow and most carry two. That is a broad, boring, intact uptrend — the context in which today's print gets traded.
At 11:51 Tuesday night he published a note whose title is the call: “Raising Our S&P 500 Earnings & Price Targets Outlook Due To FEMO.” The direction is his own word. The level is behind his subscriber wall and no outlet has picked it up, so this letter retires his 8,250 rather than carrying a number that its author has superseded.
What is quotable is the arithmetic he leads with, and it cuts against his own conclusion. With ninety percent of the index reported, he puts second-quarter earnings per share at $97.83, of which $14.00 is mark-to-market gains on Alphabet's and Amazon's holdings plus a Meta tax reversal. Reported growth of 46.7% becomes 25.7% once those are stripped — he publishes both, tells you to use the clean one, then raises his targets on the quarter.
Nine hours earlier, on television, he called Nvidia's financing arrangement “a little bit of hype.” Cautious on the mechanism, bullish on the index it is inflating — both his, on the same day.
Tuesday's Thoughts on the Market is the clearest tier-one stance shift of the window, and it is not about direction — it is about what gets paid. Wilson describes the market moving from rewarding growth to demanding “growth with durable earnings, strong margins, and free cash flow,” framing it as early-cycle broadening giving way to a mid-cycle quality rotation. The AI trade, in his words, is moving from the promise to the evidence.
The expression: quality, AI adopters and hyperscalers over semiconductors. He names rates and oil as the live risks — the two things that moved most this week. No index target attaches to this note.
The title carries the turn: “Becoming Increasingly Concerned About the ‘High Risk’ in ‘High Risk Bull Market’.” His evidence is credit and labour rather than valuation — a record 6% private-credit default rate in the second quarter against 5.7% prior, a thirty-year yield above five percent for the first time in nearly a decade, and July payrolls at −23,000 against an eighty-thousand consensus.
His most useful observation is conditional. With three-month payroll growth under twenty thousand, the historical Fed has hiked roughly nine percent of the time over the following six months and cut seventy percent. The market is pricing the nine.
Two more raises landed inside the window. Dubravko Lakos-Bujas took JPMorgan's year-end target to 8,000 from 7,800, arguing AI capital expenditure is converting into revenue faster than it is being spent — which puts JPMorgan level with Goldman's house number and Deutsche Bank's street high. Sam Stovall at CFRA moved his twelve-month figure to 8,650, calling for a fourth consecutive double-digit year, last seen in the late nineties. And Marci McGregor of Bank of America Private Bank, new to these pages, says she is a buyer of equities on any weakness — putting three seats at one firm on three different sides, since Subramanian's 7,100 is the street's low and Hartnett's gauge is flashing sell. Nothing is reconciled there; they are different desks and are allowed to disagree.
On the flow side, Goldman's prime desk had hedge funds net buying global equities for a second consecutive week to August 7, long purchases running about 1.4 to 1 against short sales, across eight of eleven sectors.
| Voice | Stance | Where they stand now | Dated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ed Yardeni Yardeni Research | BULL | Target raised, level unpublished. 8,250 retired, not carried. | Aug 11 |
| Mike Wilson Morgan Stanley | BULL | Quality over growth; adopters and hyperscalers over semis. | Aug 11 |
| Dubravko Lakos-Bujas JPMorgan | BULL | Year-end 8,000, raised from 7,800 on AI monetisation. | Aug 10 |
| Sam Stovall CFRA | BULL | Twelve-month 8,650; year-end 8,050. | Aug 10 |
| Bob Doll Crossmark | CAUT | Turned. Credit defaults and the payroll break are the tells. | Aug 10 |
| Michael Hartnett BofA | CAUT | Bull & Bear at 9.7, first formal sell signal since 2021. | Aug 7 |
| Marci McGregor BofA Private Bank | BULL | Buyer of equities on any weakness. New to the roster. | Aug 11 |
| Savita Subramanian BofA | BEAR | 7,100 stands as the street low and has not been refreshed. | Dec 2025 |
| UBS Chief Investment Office | BULL | Constructive on AI; flags circular financing and concentration. | Aug 11 |
| Torsten Slok Apollo | NEUT | US gets the offsets to AI displacement; Europe does not. | Aug 11 |
| Ryan Detrick Carson | BULL | Reads late-July retail selling as fuel, not warning. | Aug 11 |
| Collin Martin Schwab | CAUT | A hot print reverses the Fed's patience. Explicitly conditional. | Aug 11 |
| Mark Newton Fundstrat | BULL | Sees CPI resolving a one-week triangle higher. | Aug 11 |
| Tom Lee Fundstrat | BULL | 7,900–8,000 for August, led by mega-cap and software. | Aug 9 |
| Katie Stockton Fairlead | BULL | Breakout confirmed while 7,620 holds. | Aug 4 |
| Binky Chadha Deutsche Bank | BULL | 8,000, street high; 2026 EPS lifted to $358. | Aug 3 |
| Barry Bannister Stifel | BEAR | Broken. The index sits well above his 2026 bull case. | Dec 2025 |
| Jonathan Krinsky BTIG | DARK | No dated call in the window. Last television hit August 3. | — |
| Brian Belski Humilis Investment Strategies | NEUT | Sold Qualcomm and Fifth Third, bought Truist. No index view. | Aug 11 |
The oil story stopped being a headline and became a structure. The Strait of Hormuz — roughly a fifth of seaborne crude and a comparable share of liquefied gas — remains effectively closed, and Tuesday both sides hardened rather than converged: Washington demanded compensation measured over fifty years, Tehran answered with six conditions including lifting the naval blockade. Oxford Economics now describes a lasting reduction in Hormuz traffic as the most likely outcome rather than the tail.
That is why crude keeps getting re-bid on days the inventory data says it should not. Last night's API print showed a build of more than nine million barrels against a consensus draw — the largest since February — and crude still settled higher. The 10:30 official read is the reconciliation, and the market has already told you which number it believes. Tuesday's official energy outlook assumes disruption persisting through 2027 and still has US commercial stocks beneath the five-year low through next year.
The second pressure is one this market keeps declining to price. July payrolls contracted by twenty-three thousand, unemployment at 4.1% is a five-year high, and wages ran a tenth of a percent. On the historical record Doll cites, that configuration produces cuts far more often than hikes — yet the strip is priced the other way, because three members voted to tighten in July. The labour market and the rates market are describing different economies, and today's figure is the only scheduled arbiter this week.
Torsten Slok adds the structural note underneath both: Europe and the United States face the same artificial-intelligence displacement, but only one gets the startup formation, capital expenditure and hiring that offsets it. That is why American labour data can break while the American equity market keeps making highs.
Nvidia's arrangement is the week's most important structure, and almost nobody is describing it correctly. Monday's signing was a set of non-binding memoranda with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs and KKR to establish compute-financing platforms mobilising more than five hundred billion dollars of third-party capital. The mechanism is securitisation: special-purpose vehicles own the processors as collateral, issue bonds and private-credit notes against them, and lease the compute to Nvidia's customers, usage fees servicing the debt. It makes the product cheaper to acquire without cutting its price — so future demand now carries credit sensitivity it did not carry last week.
Super Micro missed on revenue and beat handily on earnings, then guided fiscal 2027 revenue far above the street with more than sixty billion in new orders behind it; the stock added about seven and a half percent after hours. CoreWeave grew revenue 112%, raised full-year guidance, put backlog at $104bn and lifted capital expenditure to $35–39bn, gaining roughly fourteen percent. Those two prints lit the Korean memory complex overnight — Samsung +6.7%, SK Hynix +5.5%, a third straight chip-led Kospi session.
Riot Platforms rose seventeen percent on a twenty-year, 191-megawatt colocation agreement with Anthropic at Rockdale, Texas, worth about $9.1bn through 2048. Note what did not happen: peers moved about two percent. That is a single-name contract, not a sector re-rating — and it is the only verifiable Anthropic news in the window, the company's offering still a confidential draft registration with no price, share count or exchange set.
Against all that, AppLovin fell 5.1% after Bank of America cut it to neutral and trimmed 2027 growth assumptions to 23% from 31%. And Brian Belski, in his first appearance here under his new firm, disclosed selling Qualcomm and Fifth Third and buying Truist — a rotation inside the regional banks, and a single-name semiconductor exit that is not a semiconductor call.
The target range is 3.50–3.75%, held on July 29 by nine votes to three — and all three dissents, from Hammack, Kashkari and Logan, were for a hike. That is the fact most likely to be mispriced by a room that spent three years reading every meeting as a debate about the pace of easing. September carries a summary of economic projections and roughly even odds of a twenty-five basis point increase.
Chair Kevin Warsh has been plain about the frame: “There is no soft inflation target, there is no soft implicit target, not on this Committee's watch. There is only a target, and it is 2 percent.” And on the market's habit of trading the reaction function rather than the data: “Market participants are learning to play the ball and not the referee.” No official speaks today. The print lands unmediated.
It is tempting to read cheap nine-day volatility against a coin-flip hike as a simple mispricing where one side is asleep. It is more interesting than that. The options market is pricing the distribution of the number — and the Cleveland Fed's nowcast sits on consensus to the second decimal, so there is little real disagreement about what prints. The rate market is pricing the response function, which is where the uncertainty lives, because this committee already has three members who wanted to move. The trade is not long volatility into the print; it is positioning for a rate move equity volatility will not have paid you to anticipate.
The usual pre-event story is that nobody is hedged and a bad number finds an empty book. The data says the opposite: leveraged funds went net long volatility in the same week they held a near-record Nasdaq short. On a soft print both positions are wrong at once, and the covering flows compound rather than offset. The convexity this morning is on the upside, which is not where anyone is looking.
Several firms lifted year-end figures this week on the strength of a quarter whose reported earnings growth becomes 25.7% once mark-to-market gains on two companies' investment holdings are removed. Yardeni published both numbers, told readers the clean one is real, and raised anyway. Roughly twenty-one percentage points of that growth rate is the change in value of stakes AI-adjacent companies hold in other AI-adjacent companies — the same circularity UBS flagged this week in the financing structures, appearing here in the earnings line. Real under the accounting rules; not operating income, not mechanically repeatable, and doing a great deal of work behind every target on the board.
Session after session, this market has taken a real shock and given back almost nothing. It is easy to read that as conviction. It is not. It is a dealer community positioned long gamma, mechanically selling rallies and buying dips, and it will keep doing so whether the news is good or catastrophic — right up until cash trades through the flip and the same machinery reverses polarity.
Today supplies the first genuinely new information in a week, into a structure that has been absorbing old information beautifully. The vol market says it will not matter; the rate market says it may decide whether this Fed goes up in September. The honest position is that the cushion tells you how the first hour trades and nothing about the week — and that the auction at one o'clock is where the market gets asked what it actually thought.
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572