A quieter tape with the structure underneath it moved
by 12 points
- Friday was a bond-relief rally the volatility market refused to believe.The Dow added 0.98% and the S&P 0.43% as the long end finally stopped backing up — and the VIX rose 5.82% anyway. That is the second session in three where the hedge market went up against a friendly tape.
- The expiration retired the floor, not the ceiling.The rebuilt map has the put wall a hundred points lower than a session ago while the call wall did not budge. The entire widening of the corridor happened beneath the market — what a thinner September book looks like when nobody has re-hedged the downside yet.
- Overnight the damage is in memory, and it is severe.Korea’s Kospi fell 3.12% and Samsung dropped roughly 8% despite guiding to as much as 110 trillion won of shareholder returns — the market wanted a buyback timetable and did not get one. Alibaba priced a US$10.21bn placement into the same session. Neither is an S&P story; both landed on its most crowded complex.
- Every guest on Friday’s Closing Bell was on one subject.Four for four, and the subject was the bond market and the Treasury’s intervention in it — not earnings, not Nvidia, not the Fed. Three are constructive conditional on yields; the fourth thinks the government should stop intervening. When a whole panel converges on one variable, that variable is the trade.
- The week is three events, in ascending order of consequence.Core PCE and Nvidia both land Wednesday, Jackson Hole opens Thursday, and Kevin Warsh gives his first symposium keynote as chair on Friday at 10:00. The front end still prices roughly a one-in-three chance of a September hike. Nothing that matters happens before Wednesday morning.
Where everything actually sits
| Instrument | Last | Change | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES Sep S&P 500 E-mini, live | 7,667.25 | −0.31% | Settle 7,691.25, +16.88 over cash. Implied open −30.12 |
| NQ Sep Nasdaq 100 E-mini, live | 29,164.50 | −0.76% | Settle 29,387.75. Weakest of the four — memory is why |
| YM Sep Dow E-mini, live | 53,232 | −0.23% | Giving back part of a 517-point cash gain |
| RTY Sep Russell 2000 E-mini, live | 3,014.30 | −0.12% | Cash 3,017.87 after +0.85% — small caps led the bid |
| S&P 500 cash prior close | 7,674.37 | +0.43% | About 1.8% under the record; the ES 52-week high is 7,838.50 |
| Nasdaq Comp prior close | 26,180.45 | +113.29 | Level with the S&P — Friday was breadth, not tech |
| VIX prior close | 16.01 | +5.82% | Up on an up day. SPX implied 12.50% against 12.35% realised |
| WTI Oct live | 85.19 | −2.15% | Settled 87.06. Sold ahead of the sanctions detail, not on it |
| Brent live | 92.91 | −1.57% | Spread to WTI near eight dollars |
| Gold Dec live | 4,698.20 | +0.38% | After +2.15% Friday; within two dollars of 4,700 |
| Silver Sep live | 68.81 | −1.04% | Gave back part of Friday |
| Nat gas Sep live | 2.78 | +0.11% | The only energy contract with a downward long-term trend |
| US 10Y live yield | 4.718% | −1.6 bp | The level Friday’s panel kept returning to |
| US 2Y live yield | 4.238% | +0.8 bp | 2s10s +48.0 bp, flattening at the margin |
| US 30Y live yield | 5.255% | −1.8 bp | The only market on Cannon’s board down on both horizons |
| DXY live | 99.00 | +0.21% | Prior 98.80. EUR/USD 1.1666, USD/JPY 159.22 |
| Bitcoin live | 77,820 | +0.36% | After +5.92% Friday; Ether 2,469.82 |
| NVDA prior close | 214.72 | −0.98% | Reports Wednesday after the close. Range 164.07–236.54 |
| Overnight Asia / Europe | — | — | Kospi −3.12%, Hang Seng −1.89%, Nikkei −0.74%, Shanghai −0.59%. Europe flat: Stoxx 50 −0.08%, DAX −0.04%, FTSE +0.18% |
Sentiment & flow gauges
| Gauge | Reading | Prior | What it says |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN Fear & Greed | 55 | — | Neutral — the gauge says nothing is driving this market |
| AAII bulls | 35.5% | 34.7% | Below the 37.5% average for a fifth straight week |
| AAII bears | 39.9% | 37.9% | Above average for a twenty-eighth week. Spread −4.4, wk to Aug 19 |
| Net dealer gamma | −$4.98B | — | NEG GAMMA, the shallowest of the month. Levels in Section 04 |
| Leveraged funds, E-mini S&P | −281,400 | −282,400 | Net short, unchanged on the week. As of Tue Aug 18 |
| Leveraged funds, 10Y note | −2,229,000 | −2,163,700 | Short widened 65,300 — the basis trade is not shrinking |
| Equity fund flows | −$20.89B | −$21.27B | Second straight twenty-billion outflow week; bonds took +$5.16B. Wk to Aug 12 |
| Sept FOMC — hold | 68.4% | 69.4% | The other 31.6% is a hike, not a cut. Section 09 |
The NAAIM exposure index moved behind a subscription wall on August 1 and no current public reading exists, so none is quoted.
The flow read
The two positioning series that cleared verification this morning say the same thing from opposite ends of the market: leveraged funds are short the S&P e-mini and getting shorter the ten-year, while retail pulled another twenty billion out of equity funds and put five into bonds. That is not a crowd leaning into the tape — it is a crowd that has already reduced and is being carried higher by something else. What is carrying it is mechanical. Friday’s advance was led by the Dow and the Russell rather than the Nasdaq, a rate-relief bid in the parts of the index actually sensitive to the long end, on a day the thirty-year moved less than two basis points. A very small input producing a very broad response is the signature of a market that wants an excuse rather than a reason. Nothing here is broken; the structure beneath it is simply thinner than it was on Thursday, and the buyers holding it up are not the ones who would defend it.
Yesterday’s calls graded
Nothing today, everything Wednesday
| When | Event | Consensus | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 8/24 | No US economic releases | — | Treasury expected to detail the Iran sanctions package. PDD, XPeng report |
| Tue 8/25 | Case-Shiller (Jun) 09:00 · New home sales (Jul) 10:00 · Consumer confidence (Aug) 10:00 · Richmond Fed 10:00 | — | Housing and the consumer, on a week nobody trades either |
| Wed 8/26 | Core PCE (Jul) 08:30 · Durable goods 08:30 · GDP Q2 second estimate 08:30 · 5-year auction 13:00 | +0.2% m/m | The Fed’s gauge, two days before the chair speaks. Forecasters split 3.2–3.3% on the year |
| Wed 8/26 | Nvidia fiscal Q2, after the close · Salesforce · CrowdStrike | $91.0B ±2% | Company guidance; the Street is nearer $92B vs $46.7B a year ago |
| Thu 8/27 | Jobless claims 08:30 · Advance goods trade 08:30 · KC Fed 11:00 · 7-year auction 13:00 · Jackson Hole opens | — | Symposium theme is financial innovation and payments — not, on paper, policy |
| Fri 8/28 | Chicago PMI 09:45 · Michigan final 10:00 · Warsh Jackson Hole keynote 10:00 | — | His first as chair, nineteen days before the September decision |
Scenario language describes how desks and pricing frame outcomes. It is not a recommendation.
Two independent models, one band above cash
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +16.88 | Role in today’s tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 8,000.00 | 8,017 | Ceiling, 326 points above cash — the same strike it held before the expiration. When every other level moves and the ceiling does not, it usually means nobody is writing upside, not that anybody expects to get there. |
| Gamma flip | 7,685.96 | 7,703 | The regime boundary, and cash closed just 11.59 points underneath it. Below the line dealer hedging travels with price and extends moves; above it, against. ES has to reclaim 7,703 to put the tape back into the dampened state, and it is within forty points of that this morning. |
| Max pain | 7,700.00 | 7,717 | Today’s expiration magnet, 25.63 points above cash and above the flip — what pull there is points up. It recomputes through the session, so read it as a fifteen-point zone; it is the one number here that is not settled. |
| Put wall | 7,500.00 | 7,517 | Floor, and it moved a hundred points further away at Friday’s expiration. That leaves 174 points between cash and the nearest published structure beneath it — the widest gap under this market in two weeks. |
Gamma levels from a public dealer-gamma (GEX) model, computed on the August 21 close. The August monthly cleared Friday, so this is the first map built on the September and October book.
What Cannon’s own levels say
The September contract’s daily pivot is 7,688.92, with R1 at 7,716.58 and S1 at 7,663.83. Two of those deserve a second look next to the table above. The pivot sits fourteen points below the gamma flip in futures terms — the arithmetic a floor trader runs off Friday’s range and the level an options model derives from open interest are inside the same handful of ticks. And R1 is thirty hundredths of a point from where today’s max pain converts into ES.
Trend and structure
Cannon’s trend read on Friday’s closes is almost uniformly constructive, and the exceptions are the interesting part. The index contracts are up on both horizons; so are gold, silver, copper and crude. Four markets carry a downward long-term trend: the thirty-year Treasury, natural gas, the euro and — despite a strong Friday — bitcoin, short-term up and long-term down at once. The thirty-year is the only market on the board pointing down on both measures, and everything Friday’s panel argued about is visible in that one row. Note too that essentially no volatility premium is being paid for a week containing core PCE, Nvidia and a new chair’s first symposium address.
Five voices moved, and four of them moved on bonds
Yardeni coined the term bond vigilantes in 1983, when what worried them was a two hundred and fifty billion dollar annual deficit. Asked whether they are at work now, he said they are definitely active in Japan and the United Kingdom and are “starting to stir” here — but he is not concerned yet, because a ten-year yield in the mid-fours is simply back to normal for an economy doing quite well.
What matters is his arithmetic, because he showed it. Analysts look for $408 of S&P 500 earnings next year; he expects that marked up to $415 by year-end. At a multiple of 20.24, where the market already trades, that produces 8,400 with no multiple expansion at all. On the yield question he inverts the usual framing: one divided by five is twenty, and twenty is roughly the fair-value multiple the old Fed model implies, so “a 5% bond yield is not going to bring the multiple down for the stock market.” He is betting on the 493 rather than the Magnificent Seven, with overweights in financials, healthcare, materials and industrials. And he is not ruling out a September hike — his weekend note has the futures strip implying 1.8 hikes over twelve months, up from 1.5 a week earlier. On Nvidia he admits to AI fatigue and expects a non-event.
Siegel is not a bear on equities. He is a bear on the intervention, and the distinction is his whole argument. “I am not fond of the Bessent twist,” he said on Friday’s Closing Bell, because changing the composition of the debt changes relative yields and makes the signal harder to read — at exactly the moment a new chair has said he wants the market to tell him what to do. His summary ran four words: let the market speak, and let the government listen.
On whether the long end had come untethered, he pushed back. The thirty-year did trade above five percent and that made headlines, but the ten-year never reached its high of six months ago and has been bouncing off 4.75%. Not an unruly market, in his reading — a market pricing real cost pressures, real spending pressures and a fiscal problem that eventually has to be addressed. What he is watching is the ten-year through five percent, which he called the true benchmark and the level that would really catch eyes.
His mechanical point is the one to carry into Wednesday: stocks are earnings over the interest rate, and earnings have risen fast enough to absorb rising rates all year. If expectations merely stop rising while rates keep going, that is a capitalisation problem. He does not see it near-term because he does not see how the chair moves before the midterms — not September, and not the late-October meeting, which falls six days before the vote.
Lee took the other side of Siegel on the same panel and made the cleanest case for the intervention anyone has offered. The buyback was “a wise thing to do,” he argued, and no different in kind from a company repurchasing stock when something unrelated to the business is making investors nervous about it: “it’s really an indication of value and I think just trying to put some signal out from the noise.” Asked what happens if it fails, his answer was that the Treasury has more dollars to put to work.
He reads the week as a clearing event in a positive direction and expects new highs toward 8,000 within ten days. The more useful part was diagnostic: he thinks the AI trade has stalled not on demand but on political opposition to data centres, which is precisely why the downstream names started working instead — software, biotech and crypto all sit downstream of the AI story without owning the permitting problem.
Friday’s Flow Show, as reported by Bloomberg, makes the entire risk complex conditional on a single level. If Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cannot drag the thirty-year yield below 5%, Hartnett is reported to expect a dollar slump and increased short bets against levered risk running into the November midterms — with AI hyperscalers and private credit named as the levered risk, and financials facing the same prospect if the plan does not work. The framing is Anything But Bonds: rotate to defensives and gold rather than reload.
Against Friday’s tape the conditional has not resolved in either direction. It is worth being precise about what is his and what is not: the note is client-only, and the widely circulated 9.7 reading on the firm’s bull-and-bear scale is not confirmed inside this window — the last figure this desk can stand behind is 9.6 in late July.
Talkington resolves the Siegel–Lee disagreement on liquidity rather than politics. The twenty- and thirty-year sectors are, in her description, very illiquid — roughly a six trillion dollar market in long-duration bonds — and nobody signals off them. The signalling instruments are the ten-, five- and two-year, and the Treasury is not buying those. On that reading the purchases are tiny against the aggregate and function as a statement of intent rather than a price intervention, which is what lets the chair thread the needle instead of being trapped by it.
Her second point is the one this letter thinks is underpriced: roughly 60% of the data-centre capacity scheduled to come online in 2027 has not started construction. That is a permitting logjam, not a demand shortfall, and she expects air pockets in the memory and hardware complex rather than a stop to the buildout. On the tape she is narrower — range-bound into Friday, because everything of consequence happens at the symposium.
The roster, and where it has landed
| Voice | Firm | Stance | Where it stands this morning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ed Yardeni | Yardeni Research | BULL | Restated on air with the arithmetic shown. Section 05 |
| Tom Lee | Fundstrat | BULL | New highs expected inside ten days. Section 05 |
| Jeremy Siegel | The Wharton School | CAUTIOUS | First stance recorded — bearish on the intervention, not the market. Section 05 |
| Michael Hartnett | Bank of America | CONDITIONAL | The whole call turns on the thirty-year. Section 05 |
| Bryn Talkington | Requisite Capital | RANGE | New voice — liquidity structure and the permitting logjam. Section 05 |
| Mark Newton, CMT | Fundstrat | BULL | Restated off-air Friday: a Materials breakout, three sectors ahead of Tech. Section 08 |
| Torsten Slok | Apollo | CAUT | Three straight notes on credit quality and the AI lending stack. Section 07 |
| Vishy Tirupattur | Morgan Stanley | NEW | Hyperscaler capex and where credit is pricing it. Section 08 |
| Yung-Yu Ma | PNC Asset Management Group | BULL | Restated Friday: no broad equity repricing absent a significant rise in yields. No level published for what counts as significant |
| Jonathan Krinsky, CMT | BTIG | BEAR | No appearance, no dated note since Aug 18. Carried, not restated |
| Mike Wilson | Morgan Stanley | DARK | A fifth straight week with no published episode; last dated appearance anywhere is late July. On a name this prominent the silence is the item |
| Scott Rubner | Citadel Securities | DARK | Nothing since Aug 11. Three items have published above his on the firm’s index — none of them his |
| Paul Ciana, CMT | Bank of America | HOLD | Standing Aug-to-Oct call on the dollar, gold and Treasuries. Graded in Section 02 |
| Helima Croft | RBC Capital Markets | OIL | Sceptical that new measures change Iran’s disruptive capability. Section 07 |
| Dan Ives | Yorkville Ives | BULL | Memory-as-foundational call under live test. Graded in Section 02 |
| Savita Subramanian | Bank of America | CARRIED | Nothing dated inside the window. Her seat is not Ciana’s or Hartnett’s — three desks, three calls |
Two seats on this roster remain vacant and no fresh call is attributed to either: Chris Harvey, formerly of Wells Fargo, and Jonathan Golub, formerly of UBS.
The intervention, the credit stack and the barrel
Start with what the Treasury actually did, because it is smaller than the argument about it. On Wednesday August 19 it announced it is at least doubling the per-operation ceiling on liquidity-support buybacks of long-dated nominal coupons, from two billion dollars to at least four, covering the ten-to-twenty and twenty-to-thirty year sectors, with enlarged operations running September 9 to November 4. Secretary Bessent said the next day the size could exceed four billion per issue. That is the entirety of the policy four strategists spent Friday afternoon arguing about, against a six trillion dollar market.
Torsten Slok at Apollo has spent three consecutive daily notes on the same theme from a different angle, and it is the macro thread nobody on television touched. Recovery rates are falling across the capital stack, with unsecured lending hit hardest since 2023. On Saturday he sized the exposure that worries him: roughly $146bn of application-software loans, mostly rated B minus or below, concentrated in exactly the segments where AI displacement risk is highest. He also went looking for the AI jobs shock in India and the Philippines, where it should appear first, and reported the hard data does not yet contain it. One argument across three notes: this transition is showing up in credit quality long before it shows up in employment.
On the Fed, the marker for Wednesday comes from Nick Timiraos at the Wall Street Journal, who flagged consensus for July core PCE at roughly two-tenths on the month and three point three on the year, with no meaningful wedge against July core CPI. Barclays sits a tenth lower on the annual figure and reads it as comforting enough to keep the Fed on hold. One tenth of a point is the difference between a settled question and a live one when the chair speaks two days later.
Oil is the variable most likely to make a mess of all of it, and the two people who know the file best are unimpressed by the headline. Treasury has trailed what Bessent calls the toughest sanctions in history on Iran. Helima Croft at RBC points out Iran is already among the most sanctioned nations on earth and that it is unclear how new measures change what she calls its significant disruptive capabilities — the open question being whether Washington goes after China and Russia as its remaining partners. Bob McNally at Rapidan is blunter: Iranian exports are effectively no longer a factor in pricing, given the blockade already in place. The market agrees, which is why crude is down more than two percent ahead of an announcement rather than up on it. Siegel’s observation that oil in the mid-eighties could see a hundred again inside two months is the risk case nobody is hedging.
Memory breaks first, and it is not breaking on demand
The memory complex. The overnight rout is the cleanest single-name story on the board and it did not come from a chip company. Samsung fell despite guiding to as much as 110 trillion won of shareholder returns for 2026, including thirty trillion of third-quarter dividends — investors wanted a buyback and cancellation timetable and did not get one. The headline sequence into the Sunday-night reopen ran from flat futures to a memory slide to a deepening rout, three days before Nvidia reports. That is an ownership problem rather than a demand problem, and it is why the Nasdaq contract is weakest this morning.
Alibaba priced a 710 million share placement at HK$112.70, raising HK$80bn for what the company calls full-stack AI and infrastructure; the stock was indicated around eight percent lower at the Hong Kong open. Dilution to fund AI capex is now a pattern rather than an event, and the market’s reaction to it has hardened.
The data-centre constraint. This is where the week’s real dispersion sits, and the facts have moved faster than the coverage. Texas Governor Greg Abbott posted on August 20 that his directive has halted up to 1,800 data-centre projects by requiring centres to bring their own power and water. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro signed an executive order on August 18 requiring developers to pay full electricity cost, hire local labour and win local approval before state permits — the strictest guardrails in the nation, short of a moratorium. New York has ordered a one-year ban on large centres. In Ohio a proposed constitutional amendment banning centres above twenty-five megawatts failed to qualify for the ballot, but both gubernatorial nominees have since published competing tougher-standards policies. More than five hundred and thirty counties and localities have banned or limited data centres, and an August survey by Embold Research for Heatmap News found 75% of registered voters disapprove of centres near their neighbourhoods against fifteen percent who approve.
Where credit prices it. Vishy Tirupattur at Morgan Stanley published on exactly this seam on Friday. His equity colleagues now see total 2027 capital expenditure for the four largest hyperscalers rising 57% against 2026. Hyperscaler credit spreads widened over the summer, most visibly in unsecured bonds, with much milder widening in data-centre asset-backed and mortgage paper. His distinction is the one to hold: double-A hyperscalers are largely insensitive to funding costs, while lower-quality developers — former bitcoin miners and property vehicles that pivoted into the business — are considerably more exposed. If the logjam bites, it bites them first.
Materials. Mark Newton at Fundstrat posted Friday afternoon that August is kicking off a breakout in many materials stocks — the final push, he believes, off the 2025 lows that began in March, with agriculture and fertiliser names deserving near-term focus. He credited the Bessent buyback expansion with helping jumpstart it, and separately confirmed materials was one of three sectors he named as more appealing than technology near-term; the other two were not published. Yardeni’s overweight list also contains materials, arrived at from an entirely different direction. Two prominent independent voices, same sector, opposite reasoning — one on the chart, one on the earnings arithmetic.
Also on the tape. Moderna closed Friday up 8.86% at 145.13 on 87 million shares; Intel fell 2.24%. Salesforce, CrowdStrike and Workday all report later this week.
A new chair, an old question, and Friday morning
Kevin Warsh has been chair since May 22 and has not yet delivered a set-piece speech on where he is taking policy. He does that on Friday at 10:00, in his first Jackson Hole keynote, nineteen days before the September 15–16 decision. The symposium’s published theme is financial innovation and its implications for payments and policy, which on paper is not a monetary-policy address at all. Nobody is going to hear it that way.
The pricing question is unusual enough to state plainly: the debate is whether this Fed hikes in September, not whether it cuts. Front-end odds ran into the low eighties in late July on the oil-driven inflation scare, collapsed after the weak July payroll report, and now sit near a third. Siegel and Yardeni addressed the timing on Friday and landed in different places: Siegel argued the chair cannot plausibly move in September or at the late-October meeting, six days before the midterms, while Yardeni thinks a September move is still live because Warsh has staked his credibility on price stability and has said publicly the Fed has missed its target for five years. Wednesday’s core PCE is the last major input before he speaks.
The closer
The corridor did not widen. The floor retreated, which is a different thing entirely.
By Wednesday every desk note will describe a five-hundred-point band between the walls and file it under wide, calm, room to move. Read it the other way. The ceiling is the same strike it was before Friday’s expiration — unchanged, untouched, nobody wrote a new one. Every point of the widening came from the floor moving down and away. That is not a market with more room; it is one where the structure above attracted no new interest and the structure below was abandoned, leaving the largest unstructured gap beneath cash in a fortnight. A wide corridor built by a retreating floor is not the same asset as one built by two active walls, and the difference shows up on exactly the kind of day this week is likely to produce.
Two models that share no inputs put today’s first resistance at the same tick.
A daily pivot is arithmetic — Friday’s high, low and close through a formula that has not changed in fifty years and knows nothing about options. Max pain is the opposite: a survey of where open interest inflicts the most pain, which knows nothing about Friday’s range. This morning the first puts R1 on the September contract at 7,716.58 and the second converts to 7,716.88. Thirty hundredths of a point apart. Independent methods agreeing to within a tick is not a signal in any statistical sense, but it is practical information: the mechanical traders working off pivots and the dealers hedging open interest will be doing business in the same handful of ticks, roughly fifty points above where the contract trades now. Prices where two unrelated crowds have reason to transact tend to be where the day’s argument happens.
Wednesday’s print cannot answer the question that is actually binding on the AI trade.
The market is treating Nvidia’s report as the referendum on artificial intelligence, and it will not be, because demand is not the contested variable. Jensen Huang has never once sounded uncertain about demand and there is no reason to expect him to start now. The binding constraint has quietly become physical and political — permits, power, water, and whether a state lets you build at all. It is showing up in the memory complex before anywhere else, because memory is the component whose order book runs furthest ahead of the concrete. So Wednesday evening produces a reassuring answer to a question nobody was asking, while the question that matters — can the capacity actually be built — gets settled in county zoning meetings and governors’ offices over the next two quarters, on a timetable no earnings call can accelerate. Positioning for the print is positioning for the wrong catalyst.
eli@cannontrading.com · cannontrading.com
Legal Disclosure & Risk Warning — Cannon Trading Company
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572