The Fed held 9–3 with three votes to hike, the 30-year hit its highest since 2007, and the S&P finally broke away from a 50-day it had spent a week hugging — then Microsoft's capex cut lit the futures anyway.
What's the setup, and what do I do about it before the bell.
The Fed did the thing that looks like caution and reads like a warning: a fifth straight hold, with three regional presidents dissenting in favor of a 25 basis point hike. The statement barely moved a word from June's. The vote is what changed, and the vote is the message.
| Instrument | Last | Chg | Read |
|---|---|---|---|
| S&P 500 (cash, Wed close) | 7,316.15 | −1.52% | Full-range reversal, 2 pts off the low, below the 50-day |
| E-mini S&P (ES Sep) | 7,385.50 | +0.47% | Implied open ~+16 to fair value; Microsoft is carrying it |
| Nasdaq-100 (NQ Sep) | 27,606 | +0.97% | Best of the complex; cash 11.6% off its June high |
| Dow (YM Sep) | 51,907 | +0.27% | Cash fell 1,153 pts, its worst day since April 2025 |
| Russell 2000 (RTY Sep) | 2,924.90 | +0.33% | Cash still 8.8% above its 200-day |
| VIX · VXN · OVX | 19.48 / 30.84 / 67.59 | −5.7% | Half the spike back; stress sits in tech and oil vol |
| 10Y / 2Y Treasury | 4.701% / 4.269% | +2.9 / +3.1bp | Wednesday was a bear steepener: 30Y +11.5bp, 2Y flat |
| 30Y Treasury | 5.236% | +3.6bp | The single most important number on this page |
| WTI / Brent | 84.21 / 90.96 | −0.30% / +0.24% | Wednesday +6.9%/+6.8%; no fresh premium added today |
| Gold / Silver | 4,067.30 / 58.09 | +0.77% / +0.01% | A rates story, not a fear story |
| Dollar Index / USDJPY | 100.53 / 163.29 | −0.20% | Sold into hawkish dissents — the credibility tell |
| Bitcoin | 64,510 | +0.94% | Holding while the long bond sells |
| Microsoft (MSFT) | ~421 | +7.8% | Capex guide cut, Azure +43%; ~$260bn added |
| Meta (META) | ~542 | −7.4% | Revenue beat, EPS missed ~14%, expenses +55% |
| Fortinet / Teladoc | 169.50 / 7.17 | +10.6% / −21.9% | The day's clean beat and its clean guide-down |
Index rows = Wednesday's cash close. Everything else = live pre-market, read 6:07–6:22 AM ET Thursday from CNN Markets and CNBC Pre-Markets and cross-checked against each other.
| Gauge | Reading | Prior | What it says |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNN Fear & Greed | 34 | 38.5 | Fear, and falling — nowhere near a sub-20 washout |
| AAII bull / bear | 29.6 / 42.3 | 44.9 / 32.9 | Bulls fell 15.3 pts; Jul 30 print due late morning |
| NAAIM exposure | 84.02 | 95.64 | Managers cut but stayed long; post-FOMC not yet captured |
| CBOE put/call (equity / total) | 0.61 / 1.05 | — | Single-stock traders were not buying protection |
| VVIX / SKEW | 109.5 / 139.6 | 98.5 / 143.0 | Vol-of-vol jumped while tail hedging fell |
| Fed path — Sept 16 | 62.1% hike | 54.7% | 37.9% hold, 0% cut; Oct and Dec price a hiking path too |
| Dealer gamma regime | NEG GAMMA | NEG | Cash 556 pts below the flip — deepest of this leg |
AAII stamped Jul 25, NAAIM Jul 22 — both weekly, both pre-date the reversal. Net-GEX magnitude is deliberately not printed: the only aggregator publishing one is stamped Jul 28 and lags the close.
The flow read. Nothing here looks like capitulation, and that is the problem. An equity put/call of 0.61 into a 1.5% reversal says single-name traders treated Wednesday as a rotation, not a risk event. SKEW fell while VVIX jumped eleven points — the market got hit rather than hedged, which is how air pockets form rather than how they end.
| Call from Wednesday's letter | Outcome | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| The tell is the language and the committee split, not the level | Statement barely changed from June; the 9–3 vote was the entire story | HIT |
| Oil has re-armed; the war-premium bleed is over | Crude added ~6.9% on US–Saudi strikes, and oil vol jumped 18% | HIT |
| Below the flip, dealers amplify and the call wall caps the upside | Stalled 49 pts under the wall, then a full-range break to 2 pts off the low | HIT |
| Semis are still the wound, but the China-litho scare looks oversold | Half right — the wound reopened (PHLX −5.3%), the "oversold" leg did not pay | MISS |
| CTAs sit long with the pivot just below — selling arms if it breaks | Price pulled decisively away from the 50-day rather than hugging it; trigger armed, no forced selling confirmed | OPEN |
| ET | Event | Consensus | Prior |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7:00 | Bank of England decision | not retrieved | 3.75% |
| 8:30 | Core PCE price index, June (M/M · Y/Y) | 0.2% · 3.3% | 0.3% · 3.4% |
| 8:30 | Headline PCE, June (M/M · Y/Y) | −0.1% · 3.7% | 0.4% · 4.1% |
| 8:30 | Personal income · spending, June | 0.3% · 0.4% | 0.7% · 0.7% |
| 8:30 | Q2 GDP, advance (annualized) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| 8:30 | Initial jobless claims | 205K | 187K |
| 10:30 | EIA natural gas storage | +37 Bcf | +32 Bcf |
| 11:30 | 4-week & 8-week bill auctions | — | 3.730% / 3.795% |
| AMC | Apple · Amazon earnings | $1.89 · $1.82 | — |
Consensus for GDP and claims differs across providers (2.1–2.3%, 200–205K); CNN's figures shown. Bank of England consensus not retrieved this run. Friday: employment cost index, Chicago PMI, final UMich — and the blackout lifts.
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Sep · +35.10 | Role in today's tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gamma flip | 7,872.25 | 7,907.35 | Regime boundary — and 7.6% overhead. Unreachable this week |
| Call wall | 7,500.00 | 7,535.10 | Ceiling; Wednesday's high stalled 49 points beneath it |
| Put wall | 7,500 / 7,000 | 7,535 / 7,035 | Sources diverge — see the note below. Treat the floor as unconfirmed |
Levels from a public dealer-gamma (GEX) model, close-based on Wednesday's open interest. Premium = ES Sep settle 7,351.25 − SPX cash close, re-derived daily. Put-wall flag: the primary model returns the single highest-gamma strike and has pinned both walls on one strike, which cannot be right; the cross-check aggregator puts the downside wall 500 points lower but is stamped Jul 28. Both are shown rather than one picked.
The volatility curve. VX futures settled Wednesday in contango across the strip — August 20.31, September 20.58, October 21.06 — while spot VIX closed 20.66, thirty-five cents above the front contract. That shallow kink is an event-day bid in spot the curve declined to validate, and the curve was right: half the spike is already back. VIX against three-month VIX sits at 0.96, short of the inverted reading that marks genuine stress.
Breadth and structure. The index that broke is not the market that broke: 66.5% of constituents held above their 50-day and advancers to decliners ran 178 to 314, heavy but not a washout. Cannon's September ES pivot sits at 7,388.42, first resistance 7,450.58, first support 7,275.83 — and futures are trading essentially on the pivot, which makes 8:30 the arbiter of which side the cash open takes.
Who's driving this, and what they actually said.
The split on the roster is not bulls against bears — it is whether Warsh's hold was a failure of nerve or a deliberate gap between saying and doing.
Minutes after the decision, Gundlach argued a hold does not get the job done: "If you really want to get to 2%, I think you have to raise interest rates." On the timeline: "getting 2% is going to take a long time. We might not get there over the course of the next couple of years."
His read of the price action is the part worth keeping. The two-year rallied, he said, "because it thinks the Fed is taking its time," while "the long bond yield went up significantly after the press conference, because the bond market vigilantes are saying, 'If you really want us to believe your rhetoric, you've got to start acting.'" Front end relieved, long end offended.
Yardeni took the most exposed position on the Street and it half-paid. On CNBC Tuesday he was the panel hawk — labor roughly balanced near 4.3% unemployment, core inflation still not at target, a Chair who had "shocked everybody" by naming price stability the number-one priority — and his call was explicit: "I will not be surprised if they do 25 basis points tomorrow," against roughly 24% market-implied odds. They did not.
His Wednesday note carries the title of the week: "Warsh Fails First Credibility Test: Bond Vigilantes Want More Than Hawkish Squawks." The operative line: "Talking hawkish but not acting so reduces the Fed's credibility. We conclude that the Fed has to raise short-term rates to lower long-term rates." A hike is therefore, for Yardeni, the bullish outcome for duration. On equities he has not moved: not an AI reckoning but AI fatigue — enormous spending, no clear sense of the return — driving rotation into "companies where we do know what they do for a living." He coined FEMA, fabulous earnings momentum, against FOMO, and reaffirmed 8,250 by year-end.
Thomas took the other side of that panel and won the week on the vote count: "I don't think they have the votes for a hike tomorrow." She expected dissents and put the first genuinely live meeting in September — precisely where the curve now sits. Hikes this year, she argues, "will end up looking like a mistake in hindsight," because tightening into geopolitically-created inflation rather than overheating demand slows an economy that does not deserve it.
On the tape she is a short-run bear and a structural bull: this is a momentum breakdown, and momentum falls as fast or faster than it rises. With a third of S&P information technology moving six percent or more in a single day, her verdict was "this is not over yet" — more downside first, not the end of the bull market. Where she wants to be: healthcare and biotech, plus China as the other side of the AI trade.
Toney supplied the framework that Wednesday night then proved. Speaking ahead of the prints he used Alphabet as the template — strong cloud growth, a backlog above half a trillion dollars, but capital spending raised to $200bn. His line: "the earnings test is changing — a revenue beat is necessary but no longer sufficient." Investors now want to know how much capital produced the growth, how fast that capacity gets utilized, and how much free cash flow comes back. Meta beat on revenue by every measure that used to matter and lost nine percent after hours — the test, exactly as specified. Where this goes next: from capex to capital structure, with hyperscalers issuing debt at an extraordinary pace and leaning on leases, guarantees and joint ventures — "capital is available but it's becoming more selective and expensive."
Rasgon's case is that the semiconductor damage is optical rather than fundamental. The SOX is roughly 25% off its peak but still up almost 60% year-to-date; because earnings roughly doubled while multiples compressed about 20%, the stocks are cheaper now than in January. "We always overshoot and undershoot." On semi-cap equipment the near-term bottleneck is clean-room availability rather than demand — you cannot ship a tool until the customer has somewhere to put it, and fabs are full. Wednesday's tape disagreed.
| Voice | Firm | Direction | One-line stance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Gundlach | DoubleLine | HAWK | A hold cannot deliver 2%; the long end is calling the bluff — see Positioning |
| Ed Yardeni | Yardeni Research | BULL | Credibility failure; hike the front to lower the back. S&P 8,250 intact |
| Liz Thomas | SoFi | CAUTION | Momentum breakdown, more downside first; hikes a hindsight mistake |
| Krishna Guha | Evercore ISI | NEUT | Hold was deliberate sequencing, not dovishness — leaves room for "one or more" increases |
| Jim Bianco | Bianco Research | MOVED | From "July is in play" to a flat call: "They are going to raise in September"; reads the dissents as an independence signal after two years of political attacks |
| Morgan Stanley | firm research | HELD | On hold this year; Warsh's comments imply a higher bar to hike than expected |
| Jim Caron | MS Investment Mgmt | NEUT | Patience over hiking; willing to let equities correct, longer trend intact |
| JPMorgan Market Intelligence | JPMorgan | MODEL | Pre-decision playbook had hawkish hold at 50%; realized move landed in its hike band |
| Emmanuel Cau | Barclays | BEAR | The only one framing it as financial conditions tightening right now |
| Ellen Zentner | Morgan Stanley WM | NEUT | Hike pricing merely pushed forward; the data decides |
| Kay Haigh | Goldman Sachs AM | HAWK | "Running out of patience with above-target inflation" |
| Stacy Rasgon | Bernstein | BULL | Semi drawdown is multiple compression against doubled earnings |
| Lo Toney | Plexo Capital | FRAMEWORK | Revenue beats no longer sufficient; capex is now a capital-structure question |
| Mark Newton | Fundstrat | TECH | 7,421 was the make-or-break line; equal-weight contradicts the QQQ break |
| Craig Johnson | Piper Sandler | BEAR | SMH far below its 50-day; ~20% more downside if the 200-day goes |
| David Kostin | Goldman Sachs | DARK | No post-FOMC equity note on any accessible carrier |
| Michael Hartnett | BofA | DARK | Silent through the decision; the Flow Show publishes Friday |
Ordered by editorial judgment of prominence, not by any score. Paywalled desks appear only via accessible secondhand carriers. Two seats stay vacant with no call attributed: Chris Harvey at Wells Fargo, Jonathan Golub at UBS.
The statement did the analytical work itself: activity "expanding at a solid pace despite elevated uncertainty that owes, in part, to the conflict in the Middle East," with inflation elevated "in part reflecting supply shocks that have driven price increases in certain sectors, including energy." That is the problem in one sentence — a Committee describing an inflation it attributes to supply while holding a tool that works on demand.
Mark Zandi of Moody's put the objection plainly: with a supply shock like the Iran war, the textbook says do not raise rates unless inflation expectations are rising. Gregory Daco of EY-Parthenon reaches the opposite conclusion from the same facts, flagging September if oil persists.
Abroad the growth data ran hot. Euro-zone Q2 GDP printed +0.4% quarter-on-quarter against +0.2% expected and German flash GDP +0.2% against +0.1% — both beats, both keeping the ECB's tightening bias intact, and both helping explain the dollar's post-decision weakness.
The energy channel is the one the Fed named. Wednesday's move came from coordinated US and Saudi airstrikes on Iran-backed groups in Iraq — retaliation for drone attacks on Saudi oil facilities — with Iran reporting fire on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and on US bases in Jordan. Overnight reporting describes further US strikes and an Iranian pledge to respond. Crude has not added a fresh premium on that, which is itself information: the tape is treating each round as bounded until proven otherwise. Oil vol disagrees.
Microsoft. Fiscal Q4 revenue of $90.0bn, up 18%, Intelligent Cloud at $39.3bn, Azure up 43% in constant currency and guided to 45%. Commercial remaining performance obligations reached $678bn, up 84%. What moved the stock was the guide down on capital spending. Two caveats: roughly two-thirds of the earnings beat came from a $3.2bn gain on the Anthropic stake rather than operations, and quarterly capex circulates as $35.8bn on a property-and-equipment basis or $41bn including finance leases. They should not be blended.
Meta. Revenue of $60.8bn, up 28% and a beat; diluted EPS of $6.18 against roughly $7.17 expected, a 14% miss; net income down 14% and operating margin at 31% from 43%. Expenses rose 55% to $42.03bn including a $2.4bn legal charge. CFO Susan Li declined to give a 2027 capex outlook; Zuckerberg's framing was "nowhere near enough compute for all the demand." Asked which revenue line scales first with quantifiable return on capital, no line was named.
The semis. The season's pattern is beat-and-get-sold. KLA beat and raised and finished Wednesday down 10.5%; NXP beat, raised, published 2030 targets and fell 7.7%; Corning beat with a strong guide and fell 18.8%. Qualcomm beat on revenue but guided next-quarter EPS to $2.15 against $2.38 expected.
Tonight and after. Apple's implied move sits against roughly $109bn of expected revenue; the $5 trillion capitalization it touched intraday on Tuesday did not hold, with the cap at $4.98tn Wednesday. Amazon carries the widest implied move on the calendar against consensus revenue of $196.2bn, and whether Andy Jassy raises FY26 capital spending is the swing factor. Further out, the SpaceX lock-up expires August 6 — roughly 911.5 million shares, 64% larger than the offering itself, landing two trading days after the company's first public quarterly report.
Contrary to the usual assumption, the blackout has not lifted. The rule runs through the Thursday after the meeting — today — so there are no Fed speakers and the Board's calendar is empty until Friday. This morning's data gets absorbed with no official voice available to shape it. Watch for separate statements from the three dissenters; September is also the next meeting with a fresh Summary of Economic Projections.
Warsh's own words are the standing guidance now: "There is no soft inflation target, there is no soft implicit target — not on this Committee's watch. There is only a target, and it is 2 percent," alongside "where necessary and appropriate, we will not hesitate to act." The sharpest framing of the institutional problem came from the Wall Street Journal's Nick Timiraos, who notes the Fed uses the labor market as its workhorse for gauging slack while the labor market is not what is driving above-target inflation — compounding supply shocks are. On springing a surprise with guidance removed, his image is the one to carry: hiking from here is "like hitting the glass ketchup bottle — you may get more than you bargained for."
Three things the tape has not priced.
The conversation about dealer positioning fixates on the regime label. The consequential fact is geometric: the flip sits 7.6% above cash, so there is no realistic path back to a dampening regime this cycle. Below spot, the two aggregators publishing a downside wall disagree by 500 points, and the one closer to the tape produces an answer its own methodology cannot support. What sits beneath this market is not a wall but an absence — thin modeled gamma where hedging adds to direction all the way down.
The systematic-selling worry rests on trend signals breaking, and the index has now spent five sessions under its 50-day. But the trend models that matter run on cap-weighted indices, and the cap-weighted index is being dragged by a cohort de-rating on its own earnings mechanics rather than anything macro. If the drawdown is a valuation event inside roughly thirty names, mechanical selling on a cap-weighted signal sells the 470 stocks that did nothing wrong — precisely the indiscriminate supply that has historically marked the end of these episodes rather than the beginning. The risk is real; the interpretation is probably backwards.
Oil volatility rose 18% in a session while equity volatility fell and tail-hedge demand declined. Read literally, equities are treating renewed conflict as a commodity problem showing up in energy earnings and consumer prices — bounded, sector-specific, tradeable. But the statement attributed elevated inflation in part to supply shocks "including energy," and three members voted to tighten into it. That makes the transmission from crude to equities run through the September decision rather than the earnings line — and a market pricing 62% odds has not obviously priced the mechanism that takes it to ninety.
Cannon Trading Company
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.
cannontrading.com • 1-800-454-9572 • (310) 859-9572