Monday’s index loss was small; the moves underneath it were not. Semiconductors fell almost 6% on the AI-safety fight, the ten-year crossed 5%, and the gamma flip rose while the index fell. Cash now sits deep in short gamma. The Fed decides tomorrow, with a hike almost fully priced.
What changes it: the 1 PM auction. No Fed official can speak until Thursday, and Empire State is a second-tier survey. The auction is the only scheduled event that can move the long end before the decision. The long end is what is pressuring equity valuations, and it is currently moving with crude.
| Instrument | Last | Change | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES Dec overnight, 1:15 AM ET · settle 7,692.75 | 7,665.50 | −0.35% | Basis to Monday’s cash close is +72.77. Section 04 converts every level |
| NQ Dec / YM Dec / RTY Dec overnight | 29,324.00 / 52,631 / 2,903.80 | −0.43% / −0.44% / −0.43% | Selling is now even across indexes, which points to rates |
| S&P 500 / Nasdaq Comp / Dow / Russell cash, Mon close | 7,619.98 / 26,186.41 / 52,421.20 / 2,892.24 | −0.48% / −0.56% / −0.29% / −0.40% | S&P range 7,592.28–7,647.99, 2.5% below the August record |
| SOX / SMH / NVDA Mon close | 11,131.28 / 541.50 / 210.96 | −5.86% / −4.75% / −3.36% | Semiconductors took the brunt of the AI-safety selloff. Section 08 |
| WTI Oct / Brent Nov overnight · settles 101.39 / 105.68 | 103.30 / 107.44 | +1.88% / +1.67% | New Houthi strikes on Saudi Arabia overnight. Section 07 |
| ULSD Oct / RBOB Oct / Nat gas Oct | 5.0613 / 3.3849 / 2.890 | +2.01% / +2.04% / −0.21% | Refined products are again rising faster than crude |
| Gold Dec / Silver Dec / Copper Dec | 4,341.90 / 63.715 / 6.40 | −0.23% / −0.66% / −0.07% | Lower on a night of Gulf escalation. Gold is trading on real rates, not as a safe haven |
| US 2Y / 5Y / 10Y / 30Y overnight | 4.680% / 4.851% / 5.025% / 5.385% | +4.6 / +6.3 / +6.4 / +5.7bp | 2s10s +34.5bp and steepening; 10-year TIPS 2.653% |
| DXY / EUR / USD-JPY / Bitcoin | 99.628 / 1.1534 / 154.84 / 77,373 | +0.24% / −0.11% / +0.32% / −2.16% | Dollar firmer into the decision; crypto lower ahead of the Senate vote |
| VIX cash, Mon close · Sep future 17.04 | 17.10 | +7.95% | Crude-oil volatility (OVX) is at 59.46 |
| Gauge | Reading | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Dealer regime Mon close | Short gamma | The deepest reading in three sessions. Friday’s near-flip lasted one day |
| CNN Fear & Greed | 31 · Fear | Down from 33 on Friday |
| AAII bull / bear w/e Sep 9 | 38.0% / 39.3% | Spread −1.3. The next reading comes Thursday, after the decision |
| Cboe equity put/call Mon | 0.67 | Up from 0.58 on Friday. Total 0.91, SPX 1.11. Protection buying is rising but not extreme |
| VIX complex Mon closes | VIX9D 16.91 · VIX3M 19.28 · VVIX 94.89 | The nine-day jumped 16.9% to almost match spot, so the curve now prices an event this week |
| SPX implied vol | 13.48% IV · 10.34% HV | IV rank 17.98%. Cboe’s Mandy Xu says weekly options price about a 1.1% move around the decision |
| CME FedWatch Sep 16 | 92.3% hike | 87.3% at the previous session, 59.4% a week ago. Section 09 |
The flow is hedging. Xu counts three of the year’s four largest VIX trades in the past two weeks, each a customer buy of more than 120,000 contracts. With buybacks in blackout and expiry on Friday, few natural buyers remain.
| When | Event | Cons / prior | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 08:30 | Empire State (Sep) | 14.1–14.8 / 20.6 | A second-tier survey. Only a large surprise would move the case for a hike |
| Tue 13:00 | 20-year bond auction | last 5.204% | The first long-bond sale since the ten-year crossed 5%. Section 10 |
| Tue | Senate procedural vote, Clarity Act | 60 needed | Needs at least seven Democrats. TD Cowen puts passage into law this year at 25% |
| Wed 08:30 | August retail sales · import prices | +0.9% / −0.6% | Control group is expected at +0.4%. This is the last hard data before the vote, and higher pump prices will inflate the nominal figure |
| Wed 10:00 | NAHB · business inventories | 34 / 35 | The 30-year mortgage rate hit 7.17% on Monday, the highest since January 2025 |
| Wed 14:00 | FOMC + SEP / dots · presser 14:30 | 3.75–4.00% | The dot plot matters more than the decision itself. Projections now extend to 2029. Section 09 |
| Thu | Claims · Philly Fed · starts · BoE | — | Goldman expects the BoE to hold at 3.75% and hike in November |
| Fri | BoJ · IP 09:15 · Bowman 09:30 · quarterly expiry | — | Bowman is the first Fed speaker after the decision. Also the index rebalance and the September future’s last trade. Lennar reports this week |
The walls held still; the index moved. It closed near the floor with the flip almost at the ceiling, so nearly the whole corridor is now short gamma.
| Gamma level | SPX | ES Dec · +72.77 | Role in today’s tape |
|---|---|---|---|
| Call wall | 7,700.00 | 7,772.77 | 80.02 above the close, and only 9.08 above the flip. It matches the heaviest call strike in the quarterly options, so the ceiling has two confirmations |
| Gamma flip | 7,690.92 | 7,763.69 | Up 25.91 on a down day. ES has to reclaim 7,763.69, about 98 points above the overnight print, before dealer hedging stops amplifying moves |
| Max pain Sep 15, 0DTE | 7,675.00 | 7,747.77 | Today’s expiry pulls 55 points above the close but stays under the flip. Friday’s quarterly max pain is 7,615, almost exactly at the close |
| Put wall | 7,600.00 | 7,672.77 | Broken by 7.72 points intraday Monday, then held on the close. ES 7,672.77 is the line, and the overnight print is already 7.27 points below it |
The September quarterly, which expires Friday and is the largest expiry on the board, confirms the ceiling. Its heaviest call strike above the market is 7,700, with 50,766 contracts, plus 52,127 puts on the same strike. Above that, open interest thins steadily: 44,328 calls at 7,800 and just 2,636 at 7,830.
The floor has two layers. The quarterly carries 57,490 puts and 54,276 calls at 7,600, roughly 111,800 contracts just below the close. But its heaviest put strike below the market is 7,500, with 84,039 puts, and roughly 145,500 contracts in all at that strike. Between the two, 7,550 carries 49,172 puts, and 7,450 carries 49,944. So 7,600 is the first floor and 7,500 is the bigger one. Open interest has not thinned out at the bottom of the measurable range, so treat anything below the mid-7,400s as a shelf, not a level.
Today’s weekly futures options are almost entirely protection. The heaviest put below the market is at 7,550 with 3,824 contracts, followed by 7,590 and 7,600. The heaviest call above the market is at 7,675 with only 1,233. Same-day traders are hedged for a break of the floor, not for a run at the ceiling.
Cannon’s daily pivot levels for September 15th had not been published at press time.
The Street’s low target has moved up. Subramanian raised her year-end S&P target to 7,400 from 7,100 and set a 12-month target of 7,800, but she kept her cautious view: the market is “overdue for a pullback.” As reported, the case is statistical: one 5% pullback this year against a typical three, and a 0.6% average September–October decline since 1928. Even after the upgrade, her target sits about 220 points below Monday’s close. The most prominent bear now expects a modest decline, not a large one.
Snider wrote this week’s note for the hike case and focused on what follows. “Today even a modest hiking cycle would likely weigh on stocks because it would be difficult for the market to be confident in advance about the duration and magnitude of tightening.” Historically, the S&P has averaged −2% in the three months after a first hike and +9% over the next twelve. The structural risk, in his view, is that AI has made this cycle “particularly capital intensive,” which raises its sensitivity to the cost of capital. By his arithmetic, a one-point rise in that cost needs two points of extra long-term growth to offset it. His conclusion: “We expect the bull market to continue.”
Matejka’s case holds only under three stated conditions: “As long as Fed hikes are measured, and occur against the backdrop of robust growth in earnings, without inflation becoming de-anchored, equities should weather that.” He expects seasonal September weakness, with oil driving risk appetite. The dots and today’s auction test two of the three conditions this week.
“7600 remains my line in the sand, while a break above ~7720 would confirm the potential bull flag. The problem? Semiconductors $SMH are moving in the wrong direction!” Keller also reports that his weekly Market Trend Model turned negative on the short-term timeframe for the fourth time since the March low. The previous three signals each produced “a very buyable dip.” His support line matches the put wall, and his trigger sits just above the call wall.
Curnutt has the most bearish named call of the day: roughly a 10% S&P decline if the Fed hikes this week. His argument is that a hike adds pressure on top of energy costs that are already squeezing margins. Snider’s own history shows an average three-month drawdown of about 2% after a first hike, so Curnutt is calling for roughly five times that.
| Voice | Was | Now | What moved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savita SubramanianBofA | 7,100 | 7,400 | No longer the Street low. Still calls a pullback overdue |
| David MericleGoldman Sachs | Hold | Hike Sep, again Dec | Says the change follows market pricing, not the data: “We do not see a strong economic case for raising the funds rate” |
| Jim ReidDeutsche Bank | Sep, Dec | Sep, Dec, Mar | “75bps of hikes over the next 7 months.” Calls August core inflation “not consistent with sufficient progress” |
| Tom LeeFundstrat | Fed holds | Rally either way | A hike is now “priced in” and a hold would be “a surprise dovish move.” He dropped the call before the decision could prove it right or wrong |
| Ed YardeniYardeni Research | 8,400, one hike | 8,400, “two or three” | Now sees a hiking cycle if oil keeps rising. His Monday note: “Warsh & Bessent Share A Credibility Problem” |
| Scott ChronertCiti | 8,100; says a hike could steady the long end | “A preemptive hike could anchor the longer end of the curve.” On size: “I’m not calling for 50” | |
| Mike WilsonMorgan Stanley | 8,000; correction risk if oil hits $120–140 | “Equities can tolerate stickier back-end yields if they are driven largely by stronger nominal growth” | |
| Mohamed El-ErianAllianz | Against a hike | His Economist column calls Treasury Secretary Bessent’s diagnosis of the bond market “dangerous” | |
BMO Capital Markets, as reported by CNBC overnight, puts the one-month correlation between front-month WTI and the ten-year yield at 0.96. That is the tightest link since June 2019. Yardeni spells out what it means for policy: rising oil lifts inflation expectations and “raise[s] the odds that we’ll be in a tightening cycle.”
The oil shock itself got worse overnight. CNBC reports new Houthi strikes on Saudi Arabia and Iranian attacks on Gulf shipping. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, which normally carries about 4 million barrels a day, is still shut, and planned Gulf–Iran talks have been postponed. RBC’s Helima Croft had flagged this exact risk: “A resumption of a full-blown Saudi-Houthi war would be a potential catalyst for our high oil price scenario” (as last published — 11 September). Real Macro’s Jeff Currie puts the odds of $5 gasoline before the midterms at “extremely high.”
The bond selloff is global. UK gilts are near their highest yields since 2007, German bunds at their highest since 2009, and the Japanese ten-year has moved above 3% three days before the BoJ meets. El-Erian says the move is “even more dramatic in higher-beta G7 sovereign bonds.” A selloff this broad is not something one central bank can reverse, which limits what tomorrow’s Fed decision can do for the US long end.
China’s August data split. Industrial output rose 5.2% against 4.8% expected, while retail sales rose only 0.4% against 0.8%. Strong supply and weak demand in China push global goods prices down, the opposite of what oil is doing, but the oil effect is larger right now. On the policy clash, Yardeni writes that the Fed chair wants to hike to prove credibility while the Treasury secretary “needs to sell more bonds at lower yields. Both can’t win.”
On Saturday, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei published an essay calling on AI labs to “pace the rate of capabilities advancement.” OpenAI’s Sam Altman replied, “I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier,” and Microsoft’s Satya Nadella endorsed “deliberate pacing.” President Trump rejected the idea at the All-In Summit: “The whole thing is a hoax.” The industry’s leaders are asking to slow down while the administration pushes for speed.
Suppliers sold off: Teradyne fell 13.30%, Coherent 12.73%, CoreWeave 6.75%, Micron 5.25%, Broadcom 4.77% and Oracle 3.65%. The likely beneficiaries of a slower, more controlled frontier rallied: CrowdStrike rose 13.85% and Palo Alto 13.09%. Microsoft gained 1.97% on a day it said it would set limits on its future models. Reuters, citing The Information, reports that Nvidia has restricted Anthropic models to less sensitive work.
Not everyone believes the slowdown is real. D.A. Davidson’s Gil Luria: “They’re being Machiavellian here… neither of them actually said we are slowing down the development of AI.” He still expects Anthropic to go public next month. Plexo Capital’s Lo Toney told Closing Bell that “ultimately we will see Anthropic go public,” this year or next. Broadcom’s Hock Tan said on Monday evening that the company’s AI revenue targets “haven’t changed.” If orders are unchanged, Monday’s chip selloff was about sentiment, not demand.
Bank of America fell 5.14% and Goldman Sachs 3.96% after Brian Moynihan guided BofA’s third-quarter investment-banking fees to $1.6–1.8 billion, against roughly $2 billion expected, with trading about flat. That is the first sign that capital-markets revenue may be fading into earnings season. Coinbase rallied on a Compass Point upgrade ahead of the Senate vote. Hewlett Packard Enterprise fell hard after Evercore ISI’s Amit Daryanani downgraded it to In Line on valuation, following a 159% gain this year. Baird cut Nike to Neutral with a $44 target.
Futures price a hike to 3.75–4.00% tomorrow and about a 75% chance of a second in December. CNBC’s count puts Warsh, Logan, Hammack, Kashkari and Cook in favor. It lists Waller, Williams, Barr, Paulson and Goolsbee as leaning toward a hold, and Jefferson, Powell and Bowman as uncommitted. Waller’s argument for holding: “What’s the cost of waiting one meeting?” Former New York Fed President Bill Dudley argues the reverse, saying a hold “would really damage his credibility.” President Trump said on Monday that the US “should be paying the lowest interest rate in the world.” Three things to watch at 2 PM: dissents in either direction; the 2026 median dot, which Deutsche Bank expects to show another hike this year; and whether Warsh frames the move as a single step or the start of a cycle. The blackout runs through Thursday.
Almost all of this week’s commentary is about the Fed decision. Little of it is about the auction, even though the long end is what has been hurting equities. The last 20-year bond sold at 5.204%, and last week’s 30-year sold at 5.308%. Today is the first long-bond sale since the ten-year crossed 5%, one day before a hike meant to reassure bond buyers.
A weak auction would signal, before the Fed even speaks, that a hike alone will not fix the long end, and it would test the 7,600 floor this afternoon. A strong one would show that 5% attracts buyers and would take much of the risk out of tomorrow. Either result hits a market that is short gamma and sitting just above its put wall, so the move is likely to be amplified.
At that correlation, bonds no longer offset stocks in a 60/40 portfolio. Every Gulf headline pushes oil and yields up together, and both hurt stocks. Gold has not stepped in; it fell again on a night of escalation. The only volatility market pricing the risk is crude, where OVX is near 59, while the VIX is still under 20.
That changes how to read tomorrow. A credible hike is supposed to pull long yields down. If the long end is tracking oil, though, a hike does not address the cause. It can only work by slowing demand, which is the slow route that also damages growth.
Most coverage read the pacing proposal as bad for AI as a whole. The price action says otherwise. The companies calling for a slowdown already have frontier models, and Microsoft’s stock rose. If pacing becomes regulation, the leaders keep their lead and new entrants struggle to catch up. Security vendors, which any regulation would rely on, gained 13%. The losers are the suppliers whose revenue depends on everyone building at full speed.
So Monday was a rotation within AI, not a verdict against it. Hock Tan’s point about unchanged orders and Luria’s skepticism about a real slowdown fit that reading. The risk for suppliers is Washington: if pacing becomes law, the chip weakness could last longer than a sentiment selloff usually does.
This publication is provided by Cannon Trading Company for informational and educational purposes only. Content may include market commentary, technical observations, analyst opinions, and aggregated material derived from publicly available sources. While such information is believed to be reliable, Cannon Trading Company does not author, independently verify, endorse, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any third-party information referenced or summarized herein.
The information, opinions, market data, and commentary contained in this publication are subject to change at any time without notice and do not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security, futures contract, option on futures, foreign currency transaction, or any other financial instrument.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Trading Futures, Options on Futures, retail off-exchange foreign currency transactions, and other derivatives involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. You may lose all or more than your initial investment. Carefully consider whether trading is appropriate for you in light of your experience, objectives, financial resources, and other relevant circumstances.
Cannon Trading Company does not guarantee any profits and makes no representation that the strategies, ideas, analyses, or information presented will result in profitable trades or avoid losses. Any market views, analyst calls, forecasts, or third-party commentary referenced reflect the opinions of their respective authors and may or may not align with the views of Cannon Trading Company.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NO INVOLVE FINACIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETLEY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR TO ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS.
Cannon Trading Company is registered solely as a commodities broker. Nothing contained herein constitutes the provision of investment advisory services.
© 2026 Cannon Trading Company, Inc. All rights reserved.